• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Meisel, Alan
    Roth, Loren H.
    Lidz, Charles W.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatry
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    1977-03-01
    Keywords
    Civil Rights
    Commitment of Mentally Ill
    Decision Making
    *Disclosure
    Humans
    *Informed Consent
    Jurisprudence
    Mental Disorders
    *Models, Theoretical
    Psychiatry
    Risk Assessment
    United States
    ASPECTS
    Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
    Bioethics and Medical Ethics
    Health Services Research
    Law
    Medical Jurisprudence
    Mental and Social Health
    Psychiatry
    Psychiatry and Psychology
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/134/3/285
    Abstract
    The authors draw together the disparate scholarly and judicial commentaries on consent to medical treatment to develop a model of the components in the decision-making process regarding consent to or refusal of psychiatric treatment. The components consist of the precondition of voluntariness, the provision of information, the patient's competency and understanding, and, finally, consent or refusal. They offer two models of valid consent: the objective model, which focuses on the congruence or lack of it between the patient and a "reasonable" person, and the subjective model, which focuses entirely on the patient's actual understanding.
    Source
    Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):285-9.
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45420
    PubMed ID
    842705
    Related Resources
    Link to Article in PubMed
    Collections
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.