Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAppelbaum, Paul S.
dc.contributor.authorGrisso, Thomas
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:26.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:09:02Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:09:02Z
dc.date.issued1997-03-01
dc.date.submitted2010-09-10
dc.identifier.citationPsychosomatics. 1997 Mar-Apr;38(2):119-25.
dc.identifier.issn0033-3182 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid9063042
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45721
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to compare the abilities of hospitalized, medically ill patients with non-ill comparison subjects to engage in an informed consent process. Eighty-two inpatients under the age of 70 were recruited from patients admitted for evaluation or treatment of ischemic heart disease (N = 675). The comparison subjects (n = 82) were matched person-to-person on age, gender, race, educational level, and occupation and did not have histories of ischemic heart disease. The hospitalized subjects did not differ from the non-ill comparison subjects on three instruments developed to assess abilities related to decision-making competence. Demographic and mental state variables did not correlate with performance, except for verbal cognitive functioning. There is no reason to believe that hospitalized patients similar to this sample--even if being treated for potentially life-threatening conditions--are at increased risk of inability to engage in a meaningful informed consent process.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9063042&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://psy.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/38/2/119
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectComprehension
dc.subjectControl Groups
dc.subjectDisclosure
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHospitalization
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInformed Consent
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMental Competency
dc.subjectMental Status Schedule
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMyocardial Ischemia
dc.subjectNeuropsychological Tests
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.titleCapacities of hospitalized, medically ill patients to consent to treatment
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePsychosomatics
dc.source.volume38
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/251
dc.identifier.contextkey1550375
html.description.abstract<p>This study was designed to compare the abilities of hospitalized, medically ill patients with non-ill comparison subjects to engage in an informed consent process. Eighty-two inpatients under the age of 70 were recruited from patients admitted for evaluation or treatment of ischemic heart disease (N = 675). The comparison subjects (n = 82) were matched person-to-person on age, gender, race, educational level, and occupation and did not have histories of ischemic heart disease. The hospitalized subjects did not differ from the non-ill comparison subjects on three instruments developed to assess abilities related to decision-making competence. Demographic and mental state variables did not correlate with performance, except for verbal cognitive functioning. There is no reason to believe that hospitalized patients similar to this sample--even if being treated for potentially life-threatening conditions--are at increased risk of inability to engage in a meaningful informed consent process.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_pp/251
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages119-25


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record