Teaching adolescents and adults about adjudicative proceedings: a comparison of pre- and post-teaching scores on the MacCAT-CA
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PsychologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2007-01-11Keywords
AdolescentAdult
Child
Criminal Law
Ethnic Groups
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Competency
Program Evaluation
Questionnaires
*Teaching
United States
Psychiatry
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The current study investigated whether teaching was associated with improved legal understanding among adolescents and adults. Participants included 927 youth and 466 young adults, who completed the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication, the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version, and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Adolescents aged 13 and younger were less likely than older individuals to improve with teaching. IQ score was positively associated with improvements following teaching, and individuals from ethnic minority groups showed greater improvements following teaching than non-Hispanic Caucasians. The implications of these findings are discussed.Source
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Oct;31(5):419-32. Epub 2007 Jan 9. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1007/s10979-006-9069-1Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/45749PubMed ID
17211689Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s10979-006-9069-1