Association between age of onset and mood in bipolar disorder: comparison of subgroups identified by cluster analysis and clinical observation
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Bauer, MichaelGlenn, Tasha
Rasgon, Natalie L.
Marsh, Wendy K.
Sagduyu, Kemal
Munoz, Rodrigo A.
Lewitzka, Ute
Schmid, Rita
Whybrow, Peter C.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PsychiatryDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2010-12-01Keywords
AdolescentAdult
*Affect
Age of Onset
Bipolar Disorder
Child
Cluster Analysis
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Pain Measurement
Young Adult
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatry
Psychiatry and Psychology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: This study compared subgroups identified by cluster analysis and clinical observation by evaluating the association between the age of onset of bipolar disorder and self-reported daily mood ratings. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy patients with bipolar disorder provided daily self-reported mood ratings for about 6 months returning 55,188 days of data. The age of onset subgroups were determined both using previously defined cutoff values based upon clinical observation (29 years), and model-based cluster analysis. Demographic characteristics were compared in the age of onset subgroups. Univariate general linear models with age of onset subgroups and other demographic variables as fixed factors and covariates were used to analyze the percent of days depressed, euthymic and hypomanic/manic. RESULTS: Using the predetermined subgroups, demographic differences were found between the four subgroups in the diagnosis of bipolar I/II, years of illness, age and use of lamotrigine. Post-hoc pairwise comparison found that patients with an age of onset less CONCLUSION: Age of onset subgroups arising from clinical observation may be more useful than those determined by cluster analysis.Source
J Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec;44(16):1170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.009. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.009Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46064PubMed ID
20451218Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.009