Weight loss support seeking on twitter: the impact of weight on follow back rates and interactions
Authors
May, Christine N.Waring, Molly E.
Rodrigues, Stephanie
Oleski, Jessica L.
Olendzki, Effie
Evans, Martinus M.
Carey, Jennifer
Pagoto, Sherry L.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Psychiatry
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventative and Behavioral Medicine
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2017-03-01Keywords
UMCCTS fundingObesity
Peer-to-peer healthcare
Social media
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Health Communication
Health Information Technology
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatry
Psychiatry and Psychology
Social Media
Social Psychology and Interaction
Translational Medical Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
People seek weight loss support on online social networks, but little is known about how to build a supportive community. We created four Twitter accounts portraying women interested in weight loss (two obese, two normal weight/overweight) and followed health care professional and peer accounts for 2-5 weeks. We examined follow back rates, interactions, and organic follows from professionals and peers by weight status. Follow back rates did not differ by weight status when following professionals (6.8 % normal weight/overweight vs 11.0 % for obese; p = 0.4167) or peers (6.7 % for normal weight/overweight vs 10.8 % for obese; p = 0.1548). Number of interactions and organic followers also did not differ by weight status. Peers interacted with study accounts significantly more than professionals (p = 0.0138), but interactions were infrequent. Women seeking weight loss support on Twitter may need to be present for more than 5 weeks to build an interactive weight loss community.Source
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Mar;7(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0429-1. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1007/s13142-016-0429-1Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46216PubMed ID
27443643Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s13142-016-0429-1