Explication and Definition of Mental Health Recovery: A Systematic Review
| dc.contributor.author | Ellison, Marsha Langer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Belanger, Lindsay K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Niles, Barbara L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Evans, Leigh C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bauer, Mark S. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:30.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:11:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:11:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-10-05 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-04-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Oct 5. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0894-587X (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 27709376 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46246 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This review assessed the concordance of the literature on recovery with the definition and components of recovery developed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Each SAMHSA identified recovery component was first explicated with synonyms and keywords and made mutually exclusive by authors. Inter-rater reliability was established on the coding of the presence of 17 recovery components and dimensions in 67 literature reviews on the recovery concept in mental health. The review indicated that concordance varied across SAMHSA components. The components of recovery with greatest concordance were: individualized/person centered, empowerment, purpose, and hope. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27709376&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0767-9 | |
| dc.subject | mental health | |
| dc.subject | mental illness | |
| dc.subject | recovery | |
| dc.subject | systematic review | |
| dc.subject | Mental and Social Health | |
| dc.subject | Mental Disorders | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry | |
| dc.subject | Psychiatry and Psychology | |
| dc.subject | Substance Abuse and Addiction | |
| dc.title | Explication and Definition of Mental Health Recovery: A Systematic Review | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Administration and policy in mental health | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/783 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 10015283 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>This review assessed the concordance of the literature on recovery with the definition and components of recovery developed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Each SAMHSA identified recovery component was first explicated with synonyms and keywords and made mutually exclusive by authors. Inter-rater reliability was established on the coding of the presence of 17 recovery components and dimensions in 67 literature reviews on the recovery concept in mental health. The review indicated that concordance varied across SAMHSA components. The components of recovery with greatest concordance were: individualized/person centered, empowerment, purpose, and hope.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | psych_pp/783 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Psychiatry |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDuring the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
-
Rights, wrongs, and the dilemma of coerced community treatmentAn outpatient treatment approach directed to patients with histories of psychotically based dangerousness, poor compliance, and recidivism is described. Cases are presented that suggest favorable outcomes of this approach, but the coercive nature of the treatment raises questions about the psychiatrist's violation of patients' rights and transgression of ethical standards. If psychiatrists are to successfully treat the most difficult chronic patients, can we do it without legally sanctioned, benevolent, coercive treatments? One model of such treatment is outpatient commitment. There is concern that without sound outpatient commitment statutes, we may witness the reemergence of asylums.
-
Promoting the Health of Parents & Children: Addressing Perinatal Mental Health by Building Medical Provider Capacity Through Perinatal Psychiatry Access ProgramsMental health conditions are the most common obstetric complications of the perinatal period, impacting 1 in 5 individuals during pregnancy and the year following pregnancy. Perinatal mental health (PMH) conditions have deleterious effects on the health of perinatal individuals and their children, and are a leading and preventable cause of maternal mortality. Nevertheless, PMH conditions are underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. To address these gaps, Massachusetts created the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms to build the capacity of frontline medical providers to address PMH conditions by providing education, consultation, and resources and referrals. MCPAP for Moms has emerged as a successful and scalable model with at least 25 states or organizations implementing or developing similar Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs. This report summarizes the Perinatal Psychiatry Access Program model and its individual and national impact.
