Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Golia, Sallie G.
dc.contributor.authorCagande, Consuelo C.
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Mary S.
dc.contributor.authorCullins, Lisa M.
dc.contributor.authorWalaszek, Art
dc.contributor.authorCowley, Deborah S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:11:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01
dc.date.submitted2019-08-01
dc.identifier.citation<p>Acad Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;43(2):184-190. doi: 10.1007/s40596-018-0916-4. Epub 2018 Apr 6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0916-4">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1042-9670 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40596-018-0916-4
dc.identifier.pmid29626292
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46302
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: A Faculty Development Task Force surveyed the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training membership to assess faculty development for graduate medical education faculty in psychiatry departments and barriers to seeking graduate medical education careers. METHODS: An anonymous Survey Monkey survey was emailed to 722 American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training members. The survey included questions about demographics, the current state of faculty development offerings within the respondent's psychiatry department and institution, and potential American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training faculty development programming. Two open-response questions targeted unmet faculty development needs and barriers to seeking a career in graduate medical education. Results were analyzed as frequencies and open-ended questions were coded by two independent coders. We limited our analysis to general psychiatry program director responses for questions regarding faculty development activities in an attempt to avoid multiple responses from a single department. RESULTS: Response rates were 21.0% overall and 30.4% for general program directors. General program directors reported that the most common existing departmental faculty development activities were educational grand rounds (58.7%), teaching workshops (55.6%), and funding for external conference attendance (52.4%). Of all survey respondents, 48.1% expressed the need for more protected time, 37.5% teaching skills workshops, and 16.3% mentorship. Lack of funding (56.9%) and time (53.9%) as well as excessive clinical demands (28.4%) were identified as the main barriers to seeking a career in graduate medical education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing faculty development efforts in psychiatry departments and institutions, real and significant unmet faculty development needs remain. Protected time remains a significant unmet need of teaching faculty which requires careful attention by departmental leadership.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29626292&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0916-4
dc.subjectAcademic careers
dc.subjectCareer development
dc.subjectFaculty development
dc.subjectTeaching methods
dc.subjectHealth and Medical Administration
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleFaculty Development for Teaching Faculty in Psychiatry: Where We Are and What We Need
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry
dc.source.volume43
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/837
dc.identifier.contextkey15038700
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: A Faculty Development Task Force surveyed the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training membership to assess faculty development for graduate medical education faculty in psychiatry departments and barriers to seeking graduate medical education careers.</p> <p>METHODS: An anonymous Survey Monkey survey was emailed to 722 American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training members. The survey included questions about demographics, the current state of faculty development offerings within the respondent's psychiatry department and institution, and potential American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training faculty development programming. Two open-response questions targeted unmet faculty development needs and barriers to seeking a career in graduate medical education. Results were analyzed as frequencies and open-ended questions were coded by two independent coders. We limited our analysis to general psychiatry program director responses for questions regarding faculty development activities in an attempt to avoid multiple responses from a single department.</p> <p>RESULTS: Response rates were 21.0% overall and 30.4% for general program directors. General program directors reported that the most common existing departmental faculty development activities were educational grand rounds (58.7%), teaching workshops (55.6%), and funding for external conference attendance (52.4%). Of all survey respondents, 48.1% expressed the need for more protected time, 37.5% teaching skills workshops, and 16.3% mentorship. Lack of funding (56.9%) and time (53.9%) as well as excessive clinical demands (28.4%) were identified as the main barriers to seeking a career in graduate medical education.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing faculty development efforts in psychiatry departments and institutions, real and significant unmet faculty development needs remain. Protected time remains a significant unmet need of teaching faculty which requires careful attention by departmental leadership.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_pp/837
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages184-190


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record