Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanna, Julie
dc.contributor.authorKubiak, Sheryl
dc.contributor.authorPasman, Emily
dc.contributor.authorGaba, Ayorkor
dc.contributor.authorAndre, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSmelson, David A.
dc.contributor.authorPinals, Debra A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:11:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:11:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-20
dc.date.submitted2019-08-29
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jun 20. pii: S0740-5472(19)30061-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.012. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.012">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0740-5472 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.012
dc.identifier.pmid31285078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46321
dc.description.abstractGiven the interrelated nature of opioid use, criminal justice interaction, and mental health issues, the current opioid crisis has created an urgent need for treatment, including medication assisted treatment, among justice-involved populations. Implementation research plays an important role in improving systems of care and integration of evidence-based practices within and outside of criminal justice institutions. The current study is a formative qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a cross-system (corrections and community-based) opioid use treatment initiative supported by Opioid State Targeted Response (STR) funding. The purpose of the study is to assess the fit of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to a cross-system initiative, and to identify key barriers and facilitators to implementation. The process evaluation showed that adaptability of the clinical model and staff flexibility were critical to implementation. Cultural and procedural differences across correctional facilities and community-based treatment programs required frequent and structured forums for cross-system communication. Challenges related to recruitment and enrollment, staffing, MAT, and data collection were addressed through the collaborative development and continuous review of policies and procedures. This study found CFIR to be a useful framework for understanding implementation uptake and barriers. The framework was particularly valuable in reinforcing the use of implementation research as a means for continuous process improvement. CFIR is a comprehensive and flexible framework that may be adopted in future cross-system evaluations.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31285078&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.012
dc.subjectCo-occurring disorders
dc.subjectCriminal justice
dc.subjectImplementation research
dc.subjectMedication assisted treatment
dc.subjectOpioids
dc.subjectCriminology and Criminal Justice
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.subjectSubstance Abuse and Addiction
dc.titleEvaluating the implementation of a prisoner re-entry initiative for individuals with opioid use and mental health disorders: Application of the consolidated framework for implementation research in a cross-system initiative
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of substance abuse treatment
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/875
dc.identifier.contextkey15233895
html.description.abstract<p>Given the interrelated nature of opioid use, criminal justice interaction, and mental health issues, the current opioid crisis has created an urgent need for treatment, including medication assisted treatment, among justice-involved populations. Implementation research plays an important role in improving systems of care and integration of evidence-based practices within and outside of criminal justice institutions. The current study is a formative qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a cross-system (corrections and community-based) opioid use treatment initiative supported by Opioid State Targeted Response (STR) funding. The purpose of the study is to assess the fit of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to a cross-system initiative, and to identify key barriers and facilitators to implementation. The process evaluation showed that adaptability of the clinical model and staff flexibility were critical to implementation. Cultural and procedural differences across correctional facilities and community-based treatment programs required frequent and structured forums for cross-system communication. Challenges related to recruitment and enrollment, staffing, MAT, and data collection were addressed through the collaborative development and continuous review of policies and procedures. This study found CFIR to be a useful framework for understanding implementation uptake and barriers. The framework was particularly valuable in reinforcing the use of implementation research as a means for continuous process improvement. CFIR is a comprehensive and flexible framework that may be adopted in future cross-system evaluations.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_pp/875
dc.contributor.departmentImplementation Science and Practice Advances Research Center
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record