Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Melissa L
dc.contributor.authorRiker, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorGagne, Kurt
dc.contributor.authorHakulin, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Todd
dc.contributor.authorMeehan, Jonah
dc.contributor.authorStout, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorPici-D’Ottavio, Emma
dc.contributor.authorCappetta, Kelsey
dc.contributor.authorWolf Craig, Kelly S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:11:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-01
dc.date.submitted2019-10-29
dc.identifier.citation<p>Qual Health Res. 2018 Sep;28(11):1813-1824. doi: 10.1177/1049732318779050. Epub 2018 Jun 11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318779050">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1049-7323 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049732318779050
dc.identifier.pmid29890891
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46349
dc.description.abstractOne of the most understudied health disparity populations in the United States is the Deaf community-a sociolinguistic minority group of at least 500,000 individuals who communicate using American Sign Language. Research within this population is lacking, in part, due to researchers' use of methodologies that are inaccessible to Deaf sign language users. Traditional qualitative methods were developed to collect and analyze participants' spoken language. There is, therefore, a paradigm shift that must occur to move from an auditory data schema to one that prioritizes the collection and analysis of visual data. To effectively navigate this shift when working with Deaf sign language users, there are unique linguistic and sociopolitical considerations that should be taken into account. The current article explores these considerations and outlines an emerging method of conducting qualitative analysis that, we argue, has the potential to enhance qualitative researchers' work regardless of the population of focus.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29890891&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449691/
dc.subjectUSA
dc.subjectcultural competence
dc.subjectdeaf
dc.subjecthealth disparities
dc.subjectparticipatory action research
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectsocial equality
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectCommunication Sciences and Disorders
dc.subjectCommunity-Based Research
dc.subjectHealth Information Technology
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngologic Diseases
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.subjectQuantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies
dc.titleDeaf Qualitative Health Research: Leveraging Technology to Conduct Linguistically and Sociopolitically Appropriate Methods of Inquiry
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleQualitative health research
dc.source.volume28
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/908
dc.identifier.contextkey15649581
html.description.abstract<p>One of the most understudied health disparity populations in the United States is the Deaf community-a sociolinguistic minority group of at least 500,000 individuals who communicate using American Sign Language. Research within this population is lacking, in part, due to researchers' use of methodologies that are inaccessible to Deaf sign language users. Traditional qualitative methods were developed to collect and analyze participants' spoken language. There is, therefore, a paradigm shift that must occur to move from an auditory data schema to one that prioritizes the collection and analysis of visual data. To effectively navigate this shift when working with Deaf sign language users, there are unique linguistic and sociopolitical considerations that should be taken into account. The current article explores these considerations and outlines an emerging method of conducting qualitative analysis that, we argue, has the potential to enhance qualitative researchers' work regardless of the population of focus.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathpsych_pp/908
dc.contributor.departmentSystems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages1813-1824


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record