AuthorsRose, Matthias S. F.
Bjorner, Jakob B.
Anatchkova, Milena D.
Klapp, Burghard F.
Ware, John E. Jr.
UMass Chan AffiliationsDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
Document TypeJournal Article
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
Health Services Research
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND: Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) have abundant theoretical advantages over established static instruments, which could improve ambulatory monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, an empirical demonstration of their practical benefits is warranted. METHODS: We reviewed the literature and evaluated existing data to discuss the potential of CATs for use in ambulatory monitoring outside clinical facilities. RESULTS: Computerized adaptive tests are not being used for ambulatory monitoring, but initial results from their use in health care research allow for discussion of some issues relevant to ambulatory care. Evidence shows that CATs can capture the most relevant health outcomes as well as established static tools, with substantially decreased respondent burden. They can be more precise than static tools of similar length and can reduce floor and ceiling effects. Computerized adaptive tests can reliably measure a construct over time with different items, which yields the potential of introducing item exposure control in ambulatory monitoring. Studies have shown that CATs can be at least as valid as well-designed static tools in group comparisons, but further investigation is needed to determine whether psychometric advantages lead to increased responsiveness of CATs. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory monitoring of PROs demands short, yet very precise measurements, which can be repeated up to many times a day. Computerized adaptive tests may address several present shortcomings in ambulatory monitoring of PROs efficiently. However, most CAT developments have primarily focused on psychometric improvements. To use the full potential of CATs for ambulatory monitoring purposes, content must also be carefully considered.
SourcePsychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):338-48. Link to article on publisher's site
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46552
Related ResourcesLink to Article in PubMed