Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKimokoti, Ruth W.
dc.contributor.authorGona, Philimon
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Lei
dc.contributor.authorNewby, P. K.
dc.contributor.authorMillen, Barbara E.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lisa S.
dc.contributor.authorD'Agostino, Ralph B.
dc.contributor.authorFung, Teresa T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:12:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:12:44Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.date.submitted2012-10-23
dc.identifier.citationJ Nutr. 2012 Sep;142(9):1720-7. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.162479. Epub 2012 Jul 25. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.162479">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0022-3166 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3945/jn.112.162479
dc.identifier.pmid22833658
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46569
dc.description.abstractData on the relationship between empirical dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in prospective study designs are limited. In addition, demographic and lifestyle determinants of MetS may modify the association between dietary patterns and the syndrome. We prospectively examined the relationship between empirically derived patterns and MetS and MetS components among 1146 women in the Framingham Offspring/Spouse cohort. They were aged 25-77 y with BMI >/=18.5 kg/m(2) and free of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and MetS at baseline, and followed for a mean of 7 y. Five dietary patterns, Heart Healthier, Lighter Eating, Wine and Moderate Eating, Higher Fat, and Empty Calorie, were previously identified using cluster analysis from food intake collected using a FFQ. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed lower odds for abdominal obesity for Higher Fat [OR = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.91)] and Wine and Moderate Eating clusters [OR = 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.72)] compared with the Empty Calorie cluster. Additional adjustment for BMI somewhat attenuated these OR [Higher Fat OR = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.27, 1.00); Wine and Moderate Eating OR = 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.89)]. None of the clusters was associated with MetS or other MetS components. Baseline smoking status and age did not modify the relation between dietary patterns and MetS. The Higher Fat and Wine and Moderate Eating patterns showed an inverse association with abdominal obesity; certain foods might be targeted in these habitual patterns to achieve optimal dietary patterns for MetS prevention.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=22833658&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.162479
dc.subjectFood Habits
dc.subjectMetabolic Syndrome X
dc.subjectNutrition Surveys
dc.subjectObesity, Abdominal
dc.subjectDietetics and Clinical Nutrition
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectNutritional and Metabolic Diseases
dc.titleDietary patterns of women are associated with incident abdominal obesity but not metabolic syndrome
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Journal of nutrition
dc.source.volume142
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1034
dc.identifier.contextkey3418830
html.description.abstract<p>Data on the relationship between empirical dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in prospective study designs are limited. In addition, demographic and lifestyle determinants of MetS may modify the association between dietary patterns and the syndrome. We prospectively examined the relationship between empirically derived patterns and MetS and MetS components among 1146 women in the Framingham Offspring/Spouse cohort. They were aged 25-77 y with BMI >/=18.5 kg/m(2) and free of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and MetS at baseline, and followed for a mean of 7 y. Five dietary patterns, Heart Healthier, Lighter Eating, Wine and Moderate Eating, Higher Fat, and Empty Calorie, were previously identified using cluster analysis from food intake collected using a FFQ. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed lower odds for abdominal obesity for Higher Fat [OR = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.91)] and Wine and Moderate Eating clusters [OR = 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.72)] compared with the Empty Calorie cluster. Additional adjustment for BMI somewhat attenuated these OR [Higher Fat OR = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.27, 1.00); Wine and Moderate Eating OR = 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.89)]. None of the clusters was associated with MetS or other MetS components. Baseline smoking status and age did not modify the relation between dietary patterns and MetS. The Higher Fat and Wine and Moderate Eating patterns showed an inverse association with abdominal obesity; certain foods might be targeted in these habitual patterns to achieve optimal dietary patterns for MetS prevention.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1034
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1720-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record