Authors
Singer, SaraKitch, Barrett T.
Rao, Sowmya R.
Bonner, Alice F.
Gaudet, Jennifer
Bates, David W.
Field, Terry S.
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
Keohane, Carol
Campbell, Eric G.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric MedicineMeyers Primary Care Institute
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2012-09-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Although nursing homes provide complex care requiring attention to safety, research on safety climate in nursing homes is limited. Our study assessed differences in attitudes about safety among nursing home personnel and piloted a new survey, specifically designed for the nursing home context. METHODS: Drawing on previous safety climate surveys for hospitals and nursing homes, researchers developed the Survey on Resident Safety in Nursing Homes and administered it March to June 2008 to frontline caregivers and managers in 8 randomly selected Massachusetts nursing homes. Our sample consisted of 751 employees, including all full-time, direct-care staff and managers from participating facilities. First, we performed factor analysis and determined Cronbach alphas for the Survey on Resident Safety in Nursing Homes. Then, we described facilities' safety climate and variation by personnel category and among facilities by calculating the proportion of responses that were strongly positive by item, personnel category, and nursing home. RESULTS: Of 432 respondents (57% response), 29% gave their nursing home an excellent rating overall. Scores varied by personnel category and home: 51% of senior managers gave an excellent safety grade versus 26% of nursing assistants; the range in top safety grades among nursing homes was 30 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate varied substantially among this small sample of nursing homes and by personnel category; managers had more positive perceptions about safety than frontline workers. Efforts to measure safety climate in nursing homes should include the full range of staff at a facility and comparisons among staff categories to provide a full understanding for decision making and to promote targeted response to improve resident safety.Source
J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep;8(3):104-24. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824badcePermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46589PubMed ID
22814710Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824badce