Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Randall P.
dc.contributor.authorAsh, Arlene S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:34.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-30
dc.date.submitted2013-09-19
dc.identifier.citationEllis RP, Ash AS. Payments in Support of Effective Primary Care for Chronic Conditions. Nordic Economic Policy Review. 2013(514):193-212. DOI 10.6027/TN2013-514
dc.identifier.doi10.6027/TN2013-514
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46657
dc.description<p>Full text link is for entire issue of Nordic Economic Policy Review. Ellis and Ash article is on pages 193-212 of the PDF.</p>
dc.description.abstractRisk adjustment models can establish appropriate payments and incentives for delivering superior primary care, particularly to people with chronic conditions, through health-based capitation and performance assessment in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). The practical issues and administrative structures for implementing bundled PCMH payment that we discuss are relevant for single-payer Scandinavian countries as well as the US. Feasibility is supported by the “virtual all-payer” PCMH pilot of one US health plan.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2013-514
dc.subjectPrimary care
dc.subjectRisk adjustment
dc.subjectPatient-centered medical home
dc.subjectCapitation
dc.subjectPrimary care activity level (PCAL)
dc.subjectHealth Economics
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titlePayments in Support of Effective Primary Care for Chronic Conditions
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleNordic Economic Policy Review
dc.source.volume2013
dc.source.issue514
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1116
dc.identifier.contextkey4601101
html.description.abstract<p>Risk adjustment models can establish appropriate payments and incentives for delivering superior primary care, particularly to people with chronic conditions, through health-based capitation and performance assessment in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). The practical issues and administrative structures for implementing bundled PCMH payment that we discuss are relevant for single-payer Scandinavian countries as well as the US. Feasibility is supported by the “virtual all-payer” PCMH pilot of one US health plan.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1116
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages193-212


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record