Association of religiosity and spirituality with quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review
Authors
Abu, HawaUlbricht, Christine M.
Ding, Eric Y.
Allison, Jeroan J.
Salmoirago-Blotcher, Elena
Goldberg, Robert J.
Kiefe, Catarina I.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical and Population Health ResearchDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-11-02Keywords
ReligiositySpirituality
Quality of life
Global QOL
Health-related QOL
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Public Health
Religion
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: This review systematically identified and critically appraised the available literature that has examined the association between religiosity and/or spirituality (R/S) and quality of life (QOL) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: We searched several electronic online databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) from database inception until October 2017. Included articles were peer-reviewed, published in English, and quantitatively examined the association between R/S and QOL. We assessed the methodological quality of each included study. Results: The 15 articles included were published between 2002 and 2017. Most studies were conducted in the US and enrolled patients with heart failure. Sixteen dimensions of R/S were assessed with a variety of instruments. QOL domains examined were global, health-related, and disease-specific QOL. Ten studies reported a significant positive association between R/S and QOL, with higher spiritual well-being, intrinsic religiousness, and frequency of church attendance positively related with mental and emotional well-being. Approximately half of the included studies reported negative or null associations. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that higher levels of R/S may be related to better QOL among patients with CVD, with varying associations depending on the R/S dimension and QOL domain assessed. Future longitudinal studies in large patient samples with different CVDs and designs are needed to better understand how R/S may influence QOL. More uniformity in assessing R/S would enhance the comparability of results across studies. Understanding the influence of R/S on QOL would promote a holistic approach in managing patients with CVD.Source
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2777-2797. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1906-4. Epub 2018 Jun 11. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1007/s11136-018-1906-4Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46728PubMed ID
29948601Related Resources
Rights
© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11136-018-1906-4
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

