Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Lisa M.
dc.contributor.authorSutherland-Smith, James
dc.contributor.authorPrantil, Lori R.
dc.contributor.authorSato, Amy F.
dc.contributor.authorRush, John E.
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Bruce A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01
dc.date.submitted2018-06-27
dc.identifier.citation<p>Can J Vet Res. 2017 Oct;81(4):255-260.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0830-9000 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid29081582
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46732
dc.description.abstractMuscle loss associated with disease (cachexia) or with aging (sarcopenia) is common in dogs, but clinically relevant methods for quantifying muscle loss are needed. We previously validated an ultrasound method of quantifying muscle size in dogs in a single breed. The goal of this study was to assess the variability and reproducibility of the Vertebral Epaxial Muscle Score (VEMS) in other dog breeds. Static ultrasound images were obtained from 38 healthy, neutered dogs of 5 different breeds between 1- and 5-years-old. The maximal transverse right epaxial muscle height and area at the level of the 13th thoracic vertebra (T13) were measured. Length of the 4th thoracic vertebra (T4) was measured from thoracic radiography. Ratios of the muscle height and area to vertebral length (height/T4 and area/T4, respectively) were calculated to account for differences in body size among breeds. Reproducibility testing was performed on 2 dogs of each breed (26% of the total) to determine intra- and inter-investigator reproducibility, as well as intra-class correlation. Mean height/T4 = 1.02 +/- 0.18 and mean area/T4 = 3.32 +/- 1.68. There was no significant difference for height/T4 (P = 0.10) among breeds, but breeds were significantly different in area/T4 (P < 0.001). Intra-class correlation ranged from 0.80 to 0.99. Testing showed better reproducibility for height/T4 compared to area/T4. The VEMS using height/T4 was valid and reproducible for healthy dogs of different sizes and body conformations. Studies assessing this technique in dogs with congestive heart failure and other diseases associated with muscle loss are warranted.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29081582&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644455/
dc.subjectAnimal Experimentation and Research
dc.subjectAnimal Sciences
dc.subjectVeterinary Medicine
dc.titleQuantitative assessment of muscle in dogs using a vertebral epaxial muscle score
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire
dc.source.volume81
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1190
dc.identifier.contextkey12399200
html.description.abstract<p>Muscle loss associated with disease (cachexia) or with aging (sarcopenia) is common in dogs, but clinically relevant methods for quantifying muscle loss are needed. We previously validated an ultrasound method of quantifying muscle size in dogs in a single breed. The goal of this study was to assess the variability and reproducibility of the Vertebral Epaxial Muscle Score (VEMS) in other dog breeds. Static ultrasound images were obtained from 38 healthy, neutered dogs of 5 different breeds between 1- and 5-years-old. The maximal transverse right epaxial muscle height and area at the level of the 13th thoracic vertebra (T13) were measured. Length of the 4th thoracic vertebra (T4) was measured from thoracic radiography. Ratios of the muscle height and area to vertebral length (height/T4 and area/T4, respectively) were calculated to account for differences in body size among breeds. Reproducibility testing was performed on 2 dogs of each breed (26% of the total) to determine intra- and inter-investigator reproducibility, as well as intra-class correlation. Mean height/T4 = 1.02 +/- 0.18 and mean area/T4 = 3.32 +/- 1.68. There was no significant difference for height/T4 (P = 0.10) among breeds, but breeds were significantly different in area/T4 (P < 0.001). Intra-class correlation ranged from 0.80 to 0.99. Testing showed better reproducibility for height/T4 compared to area/T4. The VEMS using height/T4 was valid and reproducible for healthy dogs of different sizes and body conformations. Studies assessing this technique in dogs with congestive heart failure and other diseases associated with muscle loss are warranted.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1190
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages255-260


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record