Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBokhour, Barbara G.
dc.contributor.authorCutrona, Sarah L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:39Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.date.submitted2019-01-23
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4711-4. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4711-4">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11606-018-4711-4
dc.identifier.pmid30402817
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46776
dc.description.abstractSubmitted as Invited Editorial response to Singh Ospina et. al. Eliciting the Patient’s Agenda – Secondary Analysis of Recorded Clinical Encounters. In 1984, Elliot Mishler published a book called the Discourse of Medicine in which he argued that patients and providers bring different stories to a clinical encounter—the former reflecting the world in which the patient manages their health and illness and the latter reflecting the biomedical definitions of disease and treatment. He showed that providers far too often interrupt the patient stories in favor of a more biomedical version of the person in front of them. It was the beginning of reflections on the need to bridge these two stories in order to foster better communication and patient-centered care.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30402817&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4711-4
dc.rights© Society of General Internal Medicine (This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply) 2018
dc.subjectpatient care
dc.subjectprovider-patient communication
dc.subjectHealth Communication
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleTime to Listen More and Talk Less
dc.typeEditorial
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of general internal medicine
dc.source.volume34
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2238&amp;context=qhs_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1236
dc.identifier.contextkey13667584
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:13:39Z
html.description.abstract<p>Submitted as Invited Editorial response to Singh Ospina et. al. <em>Eliciting the Patient’s Agenda – Secondary Analysis of Recorded Clinical Encounters. </em>In 1984, Elliot Mishler published a book called the <em>Discourse of Medicine</em> in which he argued that patients and providers bring different stories to a clinical encounter—the former reflecting the world in which the patient manages their health and illness and the latter reflecting the biomedical definitions of disease and treatment. He showed that providers far too often interrupt the patient stories in favor of a more biomedical version of the person in front of them. It was the beginning of reflections on the need to bridge these two stories in order to foster better communication and patient-centered care.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1236
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1-2


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bokhour_Cutrona2019_Article_Ti ...
Size:
315.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record