Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGandek, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorRoos, E. M.
dc.contributor.authorFranklin, Patricia D
dc.contributor.authorWare, John E. Jr.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:41Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-10
dc.date.submitted2019-01-23
dc.identifier.citation<p>Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Nov 10. pii: S1063-4584(18)31515-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.017. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.017">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1063-4584 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.017
dc.identifier.pmid30419279
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46784
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate reliability, validity and responsiveness of Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-12, a 12-item short form of the 40-item HOOS. HOOS-12 provides Pain, Function and Quality of Life (QOL) scale scores and a summary hip impact score. DESIGN: Data from 1,273 FORCE-TJR hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients who completed HOOS before and six and 12 months after total hip replacement (THR) were analyzed. HOOS-12 includes a pain frequency item and three items measuring pain during increasingly difficult (sitting/lying, walking, stairs) activities; function items about standing, rising from sitting, getting in/out of a car, and walking on an uneven surface; and the 4-item HOOS QOL scale. Percent computable scale scores, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency reliability, validity (scale correlations, tests of known groups validity using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and responsiveness (effect sizes, standardized response means) were compared for HOOS-12, full-length HOOS, HOOS-PS and HOOS, JR. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability was above 0.70 for all HOOS-12 scales and above 0.90 for the HOOS-12 Summary score. Validity and responsiveness of HOOS-12 Pain, Function and QOL scales were satisfactory and reached similar conclusions as comparable full-length HOOS scales. The HOOS-12 Summary score was highly responsive in discriminating between groups who differed in global ratings of post-THR change in physical capabilities and had high effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM). CONCLUSIONS: HOOS-12 was a reliable and valid alternative to HOOS in THR patients with moderate to severe OA and provided three domain-specific and summary hip impact scores with substantially reduced respondent burden.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30419279&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.017
dc.subjectHOOS
dc.subjectHip
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measures
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Diseases
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleA 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleOsteoarthritis and cartilage
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1247
dc.identifier.contextkey13671072
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reliability, validity and responsiveness of Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-12, a 12-item short form of the 40-item HOOS. HOOS-12 provides Pain, Function and Quality of Life (QOL) scale scores and a summary hip impact score.</p> <p>DESIGN: Data from 1,273 FORCE-TJR hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients who completed HOOS before and six and 12 months after total hip replacement (THR) were analyzed. HOOS-12 includes a pain frequency item and three items measuring pain during increasingly difficult (sitting/lying, walking, stairs) activities; function items about standing, rising from sitting, getting in/out of a car, and walking on an uneven surface; and the 4-item HOOS QOL scale. Percent computable scale scores, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency reliability, validity (scale correlations, tests of known groups validity using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and responsiveness (effect sizes, standardized response means) were compared for HOOS-12, full-length HOOS, HOOS-PS and HOOS, JR.</p> <p>RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability was above 0.70 for all HOOS-12 scales and above 0.90 for the HOOS-12 Summary score. Validity and responsiveness of HOOS-12 Pain, Function and QOL scales were satisfactory and reached similar conclusions as comparable full-length HOOS scales. The HOOS-12 Summary score was highly responsive in discriminating between groups who differed in global ratings of post-THR change in physical capabilities and had high effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: HOOS-12 was a reliable and valid alternative to HOOS in THR patients with moderate to severe OA and provided three domain-specific and summary hip impact scores with substantially reduced respondent burden.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1247
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record