Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStroupe, Kevin T.
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Timothy P.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Charlesnika T.
dc.contributor.authorScholten, Joel
dc.contributor.authorBidelspach, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorOsteen, Chad
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Brent C.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Bridget M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-15
dc.date.submitted2019-07-17
dc.identifier.citation<p>Telemed J E Health. 2019 Mar 15. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0182. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0182">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1530-5627 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/tmj.2018.0182
dc.identifier.pmid30874499
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46814
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is prevalent among Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) Veterans. With clinical video telehealth (CVT), Veterans screening positive for potential deployment-related TBI can receive comprehensive TBI evaluations by providers at specialized centers through interactive video communication. INTRODUCTION: We examined health care utilization and costs for Veterans during the 12 months before and after being evaluated through CVT versus in-person. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined OEF/OIF Veterans receiving comprehensive evaluations at specialized Veterans Affairs facilities from October 2012 to September 2014. Veterans evaluated through CVT and in-person at the same facilities were included. We used a difference-in-difference analysis with propensity score weighted regression models to examine health care utilization and costs between TBI evaluation groups. RESULTS: There were 554 Veterans with comprehensive evaluations through CVT (380 with and 174 without confirmed TBI) and 7,159 with in-person evaluations (4,899 with and 2,260 without confirmed TBI). Veterans in the in-person group with confirmed TBI had similar increases in outpatient, inpatient, and total health care costs as Veterans who had TBI confirmed through CVT. However, Veterans with a confirmed TBI evaluated in-person had greater increases in rehabilitation and other specialty costs. DISCUSSION: When visits are in-person, Veterans may have opportunities to discuss more issues and concerns, whether TBI-related or not. Thus, providers might make more referrals to rehabilitation and specialty care after in-person visits. CONCLUSION: Veterans receiving in-person evaluations who were diagnosed with TBI had similar increases in health care costs as Veterans with TBI confirmed through evaluations through CVT.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30874499&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0182
dc.subjectcost analysis
dc.subjecthead injury
dc.subjecthealth care utilization
dc.subjectoperation enduring freedom
dc.subjectoperation Iraqi freedom
dc.subjecttraumatic brain injury
dc.subjectveterans
dc.subjecttelemedicine
dc.subjecttelehealth
dc.subjecte-health
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMilitary and Veterans Studies
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectTelemedicine
dc.titleHealth Care Utilization and Costs of Veterans Evaluated for Traumatic Brain Injury through Telehealth
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1282
dc.identifier.contextkey14941819
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is prevalent among Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) Veterans. With clinical video telehealth (CVT), Veterans screening positive for potential deployment-related TBI can receive comprehensive TBI evaluations by providers at specialized centers through interactive video communication.</p> <p>INTRODUCTION: We examined health care utilization and costs for Veterans during the 12 months before and after being evaluated through CVT versus in-person.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined OEF/OIF Veterans receiving comprehensive evaluations at specialized Veterans Affairs facilities from October 2012 to September 2014. Veterans evaluated through CVT and in-person at the same facilities were included. We used a difference-in-difference analysis with propensity score weighted regression models to examine health care utilization and costs between TBI evaluation groups.</p> <p>RESULTS: There were 554 Veterans with comprehensive evaluations through CVT (380 with and 174 without confirmed TBI) and 7,159 with in-person evaluations (4,899 with and 2,260 without confirmed TBI). Veterans in the in-person group with confirmed TBI had similar increases in outpatient, inpatient, and total health care costs as Veterans who had TBI confirmed through CVT. However, Veterans with a confirmed TBI evaluated in-person had greater increases in rehabilitation and other specialty costs.</p> <p>DISCUSSION: When visits are in-person, Veterans may have opportunities to discuss more issues and concerns, whether TBI-related or not. Thus, providers might make more referrals to rehabilitation and specialty care after in-person visits.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Veterans receiving in-person evaluations who were diagnosed with TBI had similar increases in health care costs as Veterans with TBI confirmed through evaluations through CVT.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1282
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record