A pilot study evaluating a simple cardiac dysfunction score to predict complications and survival among critically-ill patients with traumatic brain injury
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Neurology
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases and Vulnerable Populations
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2019-12-01Keywords
Cardiac dysfunctionCritical care
ECG
Echo
Outcomes
Traumatic brain injury
Cardiovascular Diseases
Critical Care
Health Services Administration
Health Services Research
Nervous System Diseases
Trauma
UMCCTS funding
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: To describe the frequency of cardiovascular complications and cardiac dysfunction in critically-ill patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) and cardiac factors associated with in-hospital survival. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study at a single Level-1 trauma center with a dedicated neuro-trauma intensive care unit (ICU). Adult patients admitted to the ICU with msTBI were consecutively enrolled in the prospective OPTIMISM study between November 2009 and January 2017. Cardiac dysfunction was measured using a combination of EKG parameters, echocardiography abnormalities, and peak serum troponin-I levels during the index hospitalization. These items were combined into a cardiac dysfunction index (CDI), ranging from 0 to 3 points and modeled in a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients with msTBI were included. For every one-point increase in the CDI, the multivariable adjusted risk of dying during the patient's acute hospitalization more than doubled (adjusted HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.29-4.53). CONCLUSION: Cardiac dysfunction was common in patients with msTBI and independently associated with more severe brain injury and a reduction in hospital survival in this population. Further research is needed to validate the CDI and create more precise scoring tools.Source
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec;54:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.017. [Epub ahead of print] Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.017Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46822PubMed ID
31446230Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.08.017