Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaczynski, Jane S.
dc.contributor.authorSanghai, Saket
dc.contributor.authorKiefe, Catarina I.
dc.contributor.authorLessard, Darleen M.
dc.contributor.authorMarino, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorGurwitz, Jerry H.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Weijia
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Bruce A.
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, David D.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:13:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-01
dc.date.submitted2019-11-18
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16178. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16178">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.16178
dc.identifier.pmid31574165
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46838
dc.description<p>Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.</p>
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Geriatric elements, such as cognitive impairment and frailty, commonly occur in these patients and are often cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants. We sought to systematically assess geriatric impairments in patients with AF and determine whether they were associated with oral anticoagulant prescribing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the ongoing Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation (SAGE-AF) prospective cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter study with site locations in Massachusetts and Georgia that recruited participants from cardiology, electrophysiology, and primary care clinics from 2016 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with AF age 65 years or older, CHA2 DS2 -VASc (congestive heart failure; hypertension; aged > /=75 y [doubled]; diabetes mellitus; prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]; vascular disease; age 65-74; female sex) score of 2 or higher, and no oral anticoagulant contraindications (n = 1244). MEASUREMENTS: A six-component geriatric assessment included validated measures of frailty, cognitive function, social support, depressive symptoms, vision, and hearing. Oral anticoagulant use was abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: A total of 1244 participants (mean age = 76 y; 49% female; 85% white) were enrolled; 42% were cognitively impaired, 14% frail, 53% pre-frail, 12% socially isolated, and 29% had depressive symptoms. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed to 86% of the cohort. Oral anticoagulant prescribing did not vary according to any of the geriatric elements (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] for oral anticoagulant prescribing and cognitive impairment: OR = .75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .51-1.09; frail OR = .69; 95% CI = .35-1.36; social isolation OR = .90; 95% CI = .52-1.54; depression OR = .79; 95% CI = .49-1.27; visual impairment OR = .98; 95% CI = .65-1.48; and hearing impairment OR = 1.05; 95% CI = .71-1.54). CONCLUSION: Geriatric impairments, particularly cognitive impairment and frailty, were common in our cohort, but treatment with oral anticoagulants did not differ by impairment status. These geriatric impairments are commonly cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants, suggesting that prescribers may either be unaware or deliberately ignoring the presence of these factors in clinical settings.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31574165&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16178
dc.subjectatrial fibrillation
dc.subjectcognitive impairment
dc.subjectfrailty
dc.subjectoral anticoagulants
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectPsychological Phenomena and Processes
dc.titleGeriatric Elements and Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Older Atrial Fibrillation Patients: SAGE-AF
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1307
dc.identifier.contextkey15808463
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVES: Oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Geriatric elements, such as cognitive impairment and frailty, commonly occur in these patients and are often cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants. We sought to systematically assess geriatric impairments in patients with AF and determine whether they were associated with oral anticoagulant prescribing.</p> <p>DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the ongoing Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation (SAGE-AF) prospective cohort study.</p> <p>SETTING: Multicenter study with site locations in Massachusetts and Georgia that recruited participants from cardiology, electrophysiology, and primary care clinics from 2016 to 2018.</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Participants with AF age 65 years or older, CHA2 DS2 -VASc (congestive heart failure; hypertension; aged > /=75 y [doubled]; diabetes mellitus; prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]; vascular disease; age 65-74; female sex) score of 2 or higher, and no oral anticoagulant contraindications (n = 1244).</p> <p>MEASUREMENTS: A six-component geriatric assessment included validated measures of frailty, cognitive function, social support, depressive symptoms, vision, and hearing. Oral anticoagulant use was abstracted from the medical record.</p> <p>RESULTS: A total of 1244 participants (mean age = 76 y; 49% female; 85% white) were enrolled; 42% were cognitively impaired, 14% frail, 53% pre-frail, 12% socially isolated, and 29% had depressive symptoms. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed to 86% of the cohort. Oral anticoagulant prescribing did not vary according to any of the geriatric elements (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] for oral anticoagulant prescribing and cognitive impairment: OR = .75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .51-1.09; frail OR = .69; 95% CI = .35-1.36; social isolation OR = .90; 95% CI = .52-1.54; depression OR = .79; 95% CI = .49-1.27; visual impairment OR = .98; 95% CI = .65-1.48; and hearing impairment OR = 1.05; 95% CI = .71-1.54).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Geriatric impairments, particularly cognitive impairment and frailty, were common in our cohort, but treatment with oral anticoagulants did not differ by impairment status. These geriatric impairments are commonly cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants, suggesting that prescribers may either be unaware or deliberately ignoring the presence of these factors in clinical settings.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1307
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record