Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDong, Gaohong
dc.contributor.authorMao, Lu
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Bo
dc.contributor.authorGamalo-Siebers, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jiuzhou
dc.contributor.authorYu, GuangLei
dc.contributor.authorHoaglin, David C.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:37.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:14:25Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:14:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-02
dc.date.submitted2021-10-21
dc.identifier.citation<p>Dong G, Mao L, Huang B, Gamalo-Siebers M, Wang J, Yu G, Hoaglin DC. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring. J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Sep 2;30(5):882-899. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1757692. Epub 2020 Jun 17. PMID: 32552451; PMCID: PMC7538385. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2020.1757692">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1054-3406 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10543406.2020.1757692
dc.identifier.pmid32552451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46952
dc.description.abstractThe win ratio method has received much attention in methodological research, ad hoc analyses, and designs of prospective studies. As the primary analysis, it supported the approval of tafamidis for the treatment of cardiomyopathy to reduce cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalization. However, its dependence on censoring is a potential shortcoming. In this article, we propose the inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic (i.e., the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic) to overcome censoring issues. We consider independent censoring, common censoring across endpoints, and right censoring. We develop an asymptotic variance estimator for the logarithm of the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic and evaluate it via simulation. Our simulation studies show that, as the amount of censoring increases, the unadjusted win proportions may decrease greatly. Consequently, the bias of the unadjusted win ratio estimate may increase greatly, producing either an overestimate or an underestimate. We demonstrate theoretically and through simulation that the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic gives an unbiased estimate of treatment effect.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32552451&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538385/
dc.subjectCensoring
dc.subjectIPCW
dc.subjecthazard ratio
dc.subjectinverse-probability-of-censoring weighting
dc.subjectwin probability
dc.subjectwin proportion
dc.subjectwin ratio
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.titleThe inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics
dc.source.volume30
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/1431
dc.identifier.contextkey25551196
html.description.abstract<p>The win ratio method has received much attention in methodological research, ad hoc analyses, and designs of prospective studies. As the primary analysis, it supported the approval of tafamidis for the treatment of cardiomyopathy to reduce cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalization. However, its dependence on censoring is a potential shortcoming. In this article, we propose the inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic (i.e., the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic) to overcome censoring issues. We consider independent censoring, common censoring across endpoints, and right censoring. We develop an asymptotic variance estimator for the logarithm of the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic and evaluate it via simulation. Our simulation studies show that, as the amount of censoring increases, the unadjusted win proportions may decrease greatly. Consequently, the bias of the unadjusted win ratio estimate may increase greatly, producing either an overestimate or an underestimate. We demonstrate theoretically and through simulation that the IPCW-adjusted win ratio statistic gives an unbiased estimate of treatment effect.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/1431
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages882-899


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record