Letter to the Editor on detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses by Cordero and Dans
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Hoaglin, David C.UMass Chan Affiliations
Division of Biostatistics and Health Services Research, Department of Population and Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Letter to the EditorPublication Date
2021-06-10Keywords
HeterogeneityQ statistic
I2
Biostatistics
Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Cordero and Dans give valuable advice on various aspects of detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses. For assessing statistical heterogeneity, they start with a forest plot of the study-level effect estimates and complement it with 2 related numerical measures, Q and I2. Other recommended approaches in the literature include the between-study standard deviation and a prediction interval for the effect in a new study. All these approaches have shortcomings, which investigation of heterogeneity should take into account. Surprisingly, the limitations of Q and I2, the 2 most popular, are not yet widely understood.Source
Hoaglin DC. Letter to the Editor on detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses by Cordero and Dans. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 10:S0895-4356(21)00181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34118366. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.003Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/46954PubMed ID
34118366Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.003