Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaptopoulos, Vassilios
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Edward H.
dc.contributor.authorEllison, R. Curtis
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:37.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:14:55Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:14:55Z
dc.date.issued1987-10-01
dc.date.submitted2010-05-27
dc.identifier.citationRadiology. 1987 Oct;165(1):237-9.
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid3306786
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47063
dc.description.abstractThe perceived efficacy of sonography in making diagnostic and management decisions in clinical practice was determined through a questionnaire survey of physicians who had recently referred patients to a university radiology department. Of 2,178 questionnaires sent, 1,611 were returned (74%). Sensitivity and specificity of sonography, corrected for verification bias, were 72% and 84%. Referring physicians considered the studies to be of value in arriving at the final diagnosis and in the clinical management of patients in approximately two-thirds of the cases. Results were considered of no value and misleading in 4% of the cases. Sonography was more accurate and was reported to be valuable by approximately 10% more physicians when a specific indication for an examination could be identified rather than when indications were vague and when sonographic findings were abnormal rather than normal (P less than .005). In general, sonography was of equal value to both specialists and nonspecialists. The results of this study suggest that sonography is, and is perceived by clinicians to be, an accurate and valuable clinical diagnostic modality.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=3306786&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://radiology.rsna.org/content/165/1/237.abstract
dc.subject*Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subjectEvaluation Studies as Topic
dc.subjectHospitals, University
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subject*Physicians
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.subject*Ultrasonography
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleClinicians' appraisal of sonography
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleRadiology
dc.source.volume165
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/212
dc.identifier.contextkey1332964
html.description.abstract<p>The perceived efficacy of sonography in making diagnostic and management decisions in clinical practice was determined through a questionnaire survey of physicians who had recently referred patients to a university radiology department. Of 2,178 questionnaires sent, 1,611 were returned (74%). Sensitivity and specificity of sonography, corrected for verification bias, were 72% and 84%. Referring physicians considered the studies to be of value in arriving at the final diagnosis and in the clinical management of patients in approximately two-thirds of the cases. Results were considered of no value and misleading in 4% of the cases. Sonography was more accurate and was reported to be valuable by approximately 10% more physicians when a specific indication for an examination could be identified rather than when indications were vague and when sonographic findings were abnormal rather than normal (P less than .005). In general, sonography was of equal value to both specialists and nonspecialists. The results of this study suggest that sonography is, and is perceived by clinicians to be, an accurate and valuable clinical diagnostic modality.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/212
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.source.pages237-9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record