We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGore, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSpodick, David H.
dc.contributor.authorAlpert, Joseph S.
dc.contributor.authorDalen, James E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:37.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:14:55Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:14:55Z
dc.date.issued1987-10-01
dc.date.submitted2010-05-27
dc.identifier.citationChest. 1987 Oct;92(4):721-7.
dc.identifier.issn0012-3692 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid3652758
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47064
dc.description.abstractAs part of an on-going population-based study of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI) in all 16 hospitals in the Worcester, Massachusetts Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, temporal trends in the use of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter were examined. Three thousand two hundred and sixty-three patients with validated acute MI during the calendar years 1975, 1978, 1981 and 1984 comprised the study population. There has been a consistent and significant increase in PA catheter use in patients with acute MI over time, from 7.2 percent in 1975, 13.8 percent in 1978, 14.8 percent in 1981 to 19.9 percent in 1984 (p less than .001). Ninety-six percent of patients undergoing PA catheter investigation had either congestive heart failure (CHF), hypotension or cardiogenic shock. For the combined time periods, the in-hospital case fatality rate (CFR) for patients in CHF with a PA catheter was 44.8 percent compared to 25.3 percent for patients without a PA catheter (p less than .001). For patients with hypotension and a PA catheter, in-hospital CFR was 48.3 percent compared to 32.2 percent for hypotensive patients not receiving a PA catheter (p less than .001). In contrast, for patients in cardiogenic shock the in-hospital CFR was 74.4 percent for those receiving a PA catheter as compared to 79.1 percent for patients in shock not receiving a catheter. The use of a PA catheter was associated with an increased length of hospital stay irrespective of the development of acute clinical complications. Long-term prognosis for discharged hospital survivors who had a complicated MI, for up to a five-year follow-up period was similar whether the patient did or did not receive a PA catheter during the acute period of hospitalization. In conclusion, we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect associated with the use of the PA catheter on selected patient outcomes, including in-hospital and long-term prognosis and average hospital stay, in this community-wide study of patients hospitalized with acute MI.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=3652758&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.92.4.721
dc.subjectCatheterization, Swan-Ganz
dc.subjectEvaluation Studies as Topic
dc.subjectHeart Failure
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLength of Stay
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectMonitoring, Physiologic
dc.subjectMyocardial Infarction
dc.subjectPopulation Surveillance
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subject*Pulmonary Artery
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleA community-wide assessment of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleChest
dc.source.volume92
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/213
dc.identifier.contextkey1332965
html.description.abstract<p>As part of an on-going population-based study of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI) in all 16 hospitals in the Worcester, Massachusetts Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, temporal trends in the use of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter were examined. Three thousand two hundred and sixty-three patients with validated acute MI during the calendar years 1975, 1978, 1981 and 1984 comprised the study population. There has been a consistent and significant increase in PA catheter use in patients with acute MI over time, from 7.2 percent in 1975, 13.8 percent in 1978, 14.8 percent in 1981 to 19.9 percent in 1984 (p less than .001). Ninety-six percent of patients undergoing PA catheter investigation had either congestive heart failure (CHF), hypotension or cardiogenic shock. For the combined time periods, the in-hospital case fatality rate (CFR) for patients in CHF with a PA catheter was 44.8 percent compared to 25.3 percent for patients without a PA catheter (p less than .001). For patients with hypotension and a PA catheter, in-hospital CFR was 48.3 percent compared to 32.2 percent for hypotensive patients not receiving a PA catheter (p less than .001). In contrast, for patients in cardiogenic shock the in-hospital CFR was 74.4 percent for those receiving a PA catheter as compared to 79.1 percent for patients in shock not receiving a catheter. The use of a PA catheter was associated with an increased length of hospital stay irrespective of the development of acute clinical complications. Long-term prognosis for discharged hospital survivors who had a complicated MI, for up to a five-year follow-up period was similar whether the patient did or did not receive a PA catheter during the acute period of hospitalization. In conclusion, we could not demonstrate a beneficial effect associated with the use of the PA catheter on selected patient outcomes, including in-hospital and long-term prognosis and average hospital stay, in this community-wide study of patients hospitalized with acute MI.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/213
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.source.pages721-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record