Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManning, Willard G. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorWells, Kenneth B.
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Naihua
dc.contributor.authorNewhouse, Joseph P.
dc.contributor.authorWare, John E. Jr.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:40.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:16:07Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:16:07Z
dc.date.issued1986-10-10
dc.date.submitted2010-06-18
dc.identifier.citationJAMA. 1986 Oct 10;256(14):1930-4. <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/256/14/1930">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0098-7484 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid3761499
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47325
dc.description.abstractThe less generous insurance coverage for mental health care has generated some controversy. The major unresolved question is how the demand for outpatient mental health care responds to cost sharing. We used data from a randomized trial of fee-for-service health insurance for the nonelderly to address this question. The study enrolled 5809 persons. The results are based on 19 819 person-years of data. One hundred thirty-three percent more is spent on outpatient psychotherapy when care is free to patients than when they pay 95% of the fee, subject to an annual catastrophic limit. But, the absolute level of expenditure is low on all plans; $32 per person per year with free care. The response to psychotherapy services to cost sharing is insignificantly larger than that for outpatient general medical services. We found no evidence that more generous coverage for outpatient psychotherapy decreases total health expenditures.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=3761499&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/256/14/1930
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care
dc.subject*Deductibles and Coinsurance
dc.subjectMental Health Services
dc.subjectPsychotherapy
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleHow cost sharing affects the use of ambulatory mental health services
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
dc.source.volume256
dc.source.issue14
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/465
dc.identifier.contextkey1363298
html.description.abstract<p>The less generous insurance coverage for mental health care has generated some controversy. The major unresolved question is how the demand for outpatient mental health care responds to cost sharing. We used data from a randomized trial of fee-for-service health insurance for the nonelderly to address this question. The study enrolled 5809 persons. The results are based on 19 819 person-years of data. One hundred thirty-three percent more is spent on outpatient psychotherapy when care is free to patients than when they pay 95% of the fee, subject to an annual catastrophic limit. But, the absolute level of expenditure is low on all plans; $32 per person per year with free care. The response to psychotherapy services to cost sharing is insignificantly larger than that for outpatient general medical services. We found no evidence that more generous coverage for outpatient psychotherapy decreases total health expenditures.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/465
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1930-4


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record