Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Gandek, BarbaraWare, John E. Jr.
Aaronson, Neil K.
Apolone, Giovanni
Bjorner, Jakob B.
Brazier, John E.
Bullinger, Monika
Kaasa, Stein
Leplege, Alain
Prieto, Luis
Sullivan, Marianne
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
1998-11-17Keywords
Cross-Cultural ComparisonEurope
*Health Status Indicators
Humans
*Psychometrics
*Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Data from general population surveys (n = 1483 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to cross-validate the selection of questionnaire items for the SF-12 Health Survey and scoring algorithms for 12-item physical and mental component summary measures. In each country, multiple regression methods were used to select 12 SF-36 items that best reproduced the physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 Health Survey. Summary scores then were estimated with 12 items in three ways: using standard (U.S.-derived) SF-12 items and scoring algorithms; standard items and country-specific scoring; and country-specific sets of 12 items and scoring. Replication of the 36-item summary measures by the 12-item summary measures was then evaluated through comparison of mean scores and the strength of product-moment correlations. Product-moment correlations between SF-36 summary measures and SF-12 summary measures (standard and country-specific) were very high, ranging from 0.94-0.96 and 0.94-0.97 for the physical and mental summary measures, respectively. Mean 36-item summary measures and comparable 12-item summary measures were within 0.0 to 1.5 points (median = 0.5 points) in each country and were comparable across age groups. Because of the high degree of correspondence between summary physical and mental health measures estimated using the SF-12 and SF-36, it appears that the SF-12 will prove to be a practical alternative to the SF-36 in these countries, for purposes of large group comparisons in which the focus is on overall physical and mental health outcomes.Source
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-8. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47410PubMed ID
9817135Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7