Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGandek, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorWare, John E. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, Neil K.
dc.contributor.authorApolone, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorBjorner, Jakob B.
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, John E.
dc.contributor.authorBullinger, Monika
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorLeplege, Alain
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Marianne
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:16:29Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:16:29Z
dc.date.issued1998-11-17
dc.date.submitted2010-06-18
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-8. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7
dc.identifier.pmid9817135
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47410
dc.description.abstractData from general population surveys (n = 1483 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to cross-validate the selection of questionnaire items for the SF-12 Health Survey and scoring algorithms for 12-item physical and mental component summary measures. In each country, multiple regression methods were used to select 12 SF-36 items that best reproduced the physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 Health Survey. Summary scores then were estimated with 12 items in three ways: using standard (U.S.-derived) SF-12 items and scoring algorithms; standard items and country-specific scoring; and country-specific sets of 12 items and scoring. Replication of the 36-item summary measures by the 12-item summary measures was then evaluated through comparison of mean scores and the strength of product-moment correlations. Product-moment correlations between SF-36 summary measures and SF-12 summary measures (standard and country-specific) were very high, ranging from 0.94-0.96 and 0.94-0.97 for the physical and mental summary measures, respectively. Mean 36-item summary measures and comparable 12-item summary measures were within 0.0 to 1.5 points (median = 0.5 points) in each country and were comparable across age groups. Because of the high degree of correspondence between summary physical and mental health measures estimated using the SF-12 and SF-36, it appears that the SF-12 will prove to be a practical alternative to the SF-36 in these countries, for purposes of large group comparisons in which the focus is on overall physical and mental health outcomes.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9817135&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Comparison
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subject*Health Status Indicators
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Psychometrics
dc.subject*Quality of Life
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleCross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical epidemiology
dc.source.volume51
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/550
dc.identifier.contextkey1363385
html.description.abstract<p>Data from general population surveys (n = 1483 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to cross-validate the selection of questionnaire items for the SF-12 Health Survey and scoring algorithms for 12-item physical and mental component summary measures. In each country, multiple regression methods were used to select 12 SF-36 items that best reproduced the physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 Health Survey. Summary scores then were estimated with 12 items in three ways: using standard (U.S.-derived) SF-12 items and scoring algorithms; standard items and country-specific scoring; and country-specific sets of 12 items and scoring. Replication of the 36-item summary measures by the 12-item summary measures was then evaluated through comparison of mean scores and the strength of product-moment correlations. Product-moment correlations between SF-36 summary measures and SF-12 summary measures (standard and country-specific) were very high, ranging from 0.94-0.96 and 0.94-0.97 for the physical and mental summary measures, respectively. Mean 36-item summary measures and comparable 12-item summary measures were within 0.0 to 1.5 points (median = 0.5 points) in each country and were comparable across age groups. Because of the high degree of correspondence between summary physical and mental health measures estimated using the SF-12 and SF-36, it appears that the SF-12 will prove to be a practical alternative to the SF-36 in these countries, for purposes of large group comparisons in which the focus is on overall physical and mental health outcomes.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/550
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1171-8


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record