Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, John E. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorGandek, Barbara
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:16:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:16:32Z
dc.date.issued1998-11-17
dc.date.submitted2010-06-18
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):945-52. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7
dc.identifier.pmid9817111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47418
dc.description.abstractFollowing the translation development stage, the second research stage of the IQOLA Project tests the assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction. This article provides detailed information on the research methods used by the IQOLA Project to evaluate data quality, scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability of the SF-36 scales. Tests include evaluation of item and scale-level descriptive statistics; examination of the equality of item-scale correlations, item internal consistency and item discriminant validity; and estimation of scale score reliability using internal consistency and test-retest methods. Results from these tests are used to determine if standard algorithms for the construction and scoring of the eight SF-36 scales can be used in each country and to provide information that can be used in translation improvement.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9817111&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7
dc.subjectActivities of Daily Living
dc.subjectDiscriminant Analysis
dc.subject*Health Status Indicators
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Psychometrics
dc.subject*Quality of Life
dc.subjectTranslations
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleMethods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical epidemiology
dc.source.volume51
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/559
dc.identifier.contextkey1363394
html.description.abstract<p>Following the translation development stage, the second research stage of the IQOLA Project tests the assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction. This article provides detailed information on the research methods used by the IQOLA Project to evaluate data quality, scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability of the SF-36 scales. Tests include evaluation of item and scale-level descriptive statistics; examination of the equality of item-scale correlations, item internal consistency and item discriminant validity; and estimation of scale score reliability using internal consistency and test-retest methods. Results from these tests are used to determine if standard algorithms for the construction and scoring of the eight SF-36 scales can be used in each country and to provide information that can be used in translation improvement.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/559
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages945-52


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record