Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWare, John E. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorGandek, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorKosinski, Mark
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, Neil K.
dc.contributor.authorApolone, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, John E.
dc.contributor.authorBullinger, Monika
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorLeplege, Alain
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorThunedborg, Kate
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:16:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:16:33Z
dc.date.issued1998-11-17
dc.date.submitted2010-06-18
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1167-70. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5
dc.identifier.pmid9817134
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47421
dc.description.abstractData from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=9817134&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Comparison
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statistical
dc.subject*Health Status Indicators
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subject*Quality of Life
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleThe equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical epidemiology
dc.source.volume51
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/561
dc.identifier.contextkey1363396
html.description.abstract<p>Data from general population surveys (n = 1771 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to test the algorithms used to score physical and mental component summary measures (PCS-36/MCS-36) based on the SF-36 Health Survey. Scoring coefficients for principal components were estimated independently in each country using identical methods of factor extraction and orthogonal rotation. PCS-36 and MCS-36 scores were also estimated using standard (U.S.-derived) scoring algorithms, and results were compared. Product-moment correlations between scores estimated from standard and country-specific scoring coefficients were very high (0.98 to 1.00) for both physical and mental health components in all countries. As hypothesized for orthogonal components, correlations between physical and mental components within each country were very low (0.00 to 0.12) for both estimation methods. Mean scores for PCS-36 differed by as much as 3.0 points across countries using standard scoring, and mean scores for MCS-36 differed across countries by as much as 6.4 points. In view of the high degree of equivalence observed within each country, using standard and country-specific algorithms, we recommend use of standard scoring algorithms for purposes of multinational studies involving these 10 countries.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/561
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages1167-70


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record