• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs, and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs, and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Predicting who dies depends on how severity is measured: implications for evaluating patient outcomes

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Iezzoni, Lisa I.
    Ash, Arlene S.
    Shwartz, Michael
    Daley, Jennifer
    Hughes, John S.
    Mackiernan, Yevgenia D.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    1995-11-15
    Keywords
    Adult
    Age Factors
    Aged
    Aged, 80 and over
    Cohort Studies
    Female
    *Hospital Mortality
    Humans
    Likelihood Functions
    Male
    Middle Aged
    Myocardial Infarction
    *Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Retrospective Studies
    *Severity of Illness Index
    Sex Factors
    United States
    Biostatistics
    Epidemiology
    Health Services Research
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://www.annals.org/content/123/10/763.full.pdf+html
    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether assessments of illness severity, defined as risk for in-hospital death, varied across four severity measures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 100 hospitals using the MedisGroups severity measure. PATIENTS: 11 880 adults managed medically for acute myocardial infarction; 1574 in-hospital deaths (13.2%). MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, probability of death was predicted four times, each time by using patient age and sex and one of four common severity measures: 1) admission MedisGroups scores for probability of death scores; 2) scores based on values for 17 physiologic variables at time of admission; 3) Disease Staging's probability-of-mortality model; and 4) All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs). Patients were ranked according to probability of death as predicted by each severity measure, and rankings were compared across measures. The presence or absence of each of six clinical findings considered to indicate poor prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction (congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, coma, low systolic blood pressure, low left ventricular ejection fraction, and high blood urea nitrogen level) was determined for patients ranked differently by different severity measures. RESULTS: MedisGroups and the physiology score gave 94.7% of patients similar rankings. Disease Staging, MedisGroups, and the physiology score gave only 78% of patients similar rankings. MedisGroups and APR-DRGs gave 80% of patients similar rankings. Patients whose illnesses were more severe according to MedisGroups and the physiology score were more likely to have the six clinical findings than were patients whose illnesses were more severe according to Disease Staging and APR-DRGs. CONCLUSIONS: Some pairs of severity measures assigned very different severity levels to more than 20% of patients. Evaluations of patient outcomes need to be sensitive to the severity measures used for risk adjustment.
    Source
    Ann Intern Med. 1995 Nov 15;123(10):763-70. Link to article on publisher's site
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47506
    PubMed ID
    7574194
    Related Resources
    Link to Article in PubMed
    Collections
    Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.