Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollins, Mary F. McNaughton
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Robert H.
dc.contributor.authorAsh, Arlene S.
dc.contributor.authorHall, Ruth E.
dc.contributor.authorMoskowitz, Mark A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:41.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:16:59Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:16:59Z
dc.date.issued1996-09-01
dc.date.submitted2010-07-01
dc.identifier.citationJ Gen Intern Med. 1996 Sep;11(9):513-8. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02599597">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF02599597
dc.identifier.pmid8905499
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47526
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To measure detection of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a general medicine practice. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire and retrospective ambulatory medical record review. SETTING: Hospital-based general medicine practice. PATIENTS: Two hundred and four men aged 50 years and older. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical information was obtained from a self-administered questionnaire containing the American Urological Association symptom index and the BPH Impact Index bother scale, and from retrospective review of ambulatory medical records for the previous 24 months. Thirty percent of patients had moderate to severe urinary tract symptoms, and 67% of these individuals were bothered by the symptoms. Only 52% with moderate to severe symptoms recalled any discussion with their primary care physician about their symptoms. There was medical record documentation of a review of urinary tract symptoms in only 18% and a prostate examination in only 64%. Patients with more symptoms and bother tended to recall a discussion of urinary tract symptoms with their physician. However, moderate to severe symptoms and bother were not associated with increased documentation of a history of urinary tract symptoms or prostate examination. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical BPH was underdetected in a general medicine practice. Because many men do not complain to their physicians about urinary tract symptoms and reduced quality of life, perhaps primary care physicians should pay more attention to recognizing this common condition of older men.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=8905499&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02599597
dc.subjectFamily Practice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMedical Audit
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPhysician-Patient Relations
dc.subjectProstatic Hyperplasia
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectUrination Disorders
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleUnderdetection of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia in a general medical practice
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of general internal medicine
dc.source.volume11
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/662
dc.identifier.contextkey1378808
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To measure detection of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a general medicine practice.</p> <p>DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire and retrospective ambulatory medical record review.</p> <p>SETTING: Hospital-based general medicine practice.</p> <p>PATIENTS: Two hundred and four men aged 50 years and older.</p> <p>MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical information was obtained from a self-administered questionnaire containing the American Urological Association symptom index and the BPH Impact Index bother scale, and from retrospective review of ambulatory medical records for the previous 24 months. Thirty percent of patients had moderate to severe urinary tract symptoms, and 67% of these individuals were bothered by the symptoms. Only 52% with moderate to severe symptoms recalled any discussion with their primary care physician about their symptoms. There was medical record documentation of a review of urinary tract symptoms in only 18% and a prostate examination in only 64%. Patients with more symptoms and bother tended to recall a discussion of urinary tract symptoms with their physician. However, moderate to severe symptoms and bother were not associated with increased documentation of a history of urinary tract symptoms or prostate examination.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Clinical BPH was underdetected in a general medicine practice. Because many men do not complain to their physicians about urinary tract symptoms and reduced quality of life, perhaps primary care physicians should pay more attention to recognizing this common condition of older men.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/662
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages513-8


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record