Improving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Berner, Eta S.Houston, Thomas K.
Ray, Midge N.
Allison, Jeroan J.
Heudebert, Gustavo R.
Chatham, W. Winn
Kennedy, John I. Jr.
Glandon, Gerald L.
Norton, Patricia A.
Crawford, Myra A.
Maisiak, Richard S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2005-12-17Keywords
Ambulatory Care Information SystemsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
*Computers, Handheld
*Decision Support Systems, Clinical
*Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Hospitals, University
Humans
Medication Errors
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
*Point-of-Care Systems
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Bioinformatics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing safety in the outpatient setting. DESIGN: The design was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in a university-based resident clinic. Internal medicine residents received a PDA-based CDSS suite. For intervention residents, the CDSS included a prediction rule for NSAID-related gastrointestinal risk assessment and treatment recommendations. Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray musculoskeletal symptoms presented to study physicians. Safety outcomes were assessed from the prescriptions given to the SPs. Each prescription was reviewed by a committee of clinicians blinded to participant, intervention group assignment, and baseline or follow-up status. MEASUREMENTS: Prescriptions were judged as safe or unsafe. The main outcome measure was the differential change in unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs for the intervention versus the control group. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean proportion of cases per physician with unsafe prescriptions for the two groups was similar (0.27 vs. 0.29, p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline performance, intervention participants prescribed more safely than controls after receiving the CDSS (0.23 vs. 0.45 [F = 4.24, p < 0.05]). With the CDSS, intervention participants documented more complete assessment of patient gastrointestinal risk from NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: PARTICIPANTS provided with a PDA-based CDSS for NSAID prescribing made fewer unsafe treatment decisions than participants without the CDSS.Source
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. Epub 2005 Dec 15. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1197/jamia.M1961Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47670PubMed ID
16357350Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1197/jamia.M1961