Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerner, Eta S.
dc.contributor.authorHouston, Thomas K.
dc.contributor.authorRay, Midge N.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorHeudebert, Gustavo R.
dc.contributor.authorChatham, W. Winn
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, John I. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorGlandon, Gerald L.
dc.contributor.authorNorton, Patricia A.
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Myra A.
dc.contributor.authorMaisiak, Richard S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:17:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:17:37Z
dc.date.issued2005-12-17
dc.date.submitted2010-08-05
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. Epub 2005 Dec 15. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1961">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1067-5027 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1197/jamia.M1961
dc.identifier.pmid16357350
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47670
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing safety in the outpatient setting. DESIGN: The design was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in a university-based resident clinic. Internal medicine residents received a PDA-based CDSS suite. For intervention residents, the CDSS included a prediction rule for NSAID-related gastrointestinal risk assessment and treatment recommendations. Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray musculoskeletal symptoms presented to study physicians. Safety outcomes were assessed from the prescriptions given to the SPs. Each prescription was reviewed by a committee of clinicians blinded to participant, intervention group assignment, and baseline or follow-up status. MEASUREMENTS: Prescriptions were judged as safe or unsafe. The main outcome measure was the differential change in unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs for the intervention versus the control group. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean proportion of cases per physician with unsafe prescriptions for the two groups was similar (0.27 vs. 0.29, p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline performance, intervention participants prescribed more safely than controls after receiving the CDSS (0.23 vs. 0.45 [F = 4.24, p < 0.05]). With the CDSS, intervention participants documented more complete assessment of patient gastrointestinal risk from NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: PARTICIPANTS provided with a PDA-based CDSS for NSAID prescribing made fewer unsafe treatment decisions than participants without the CDSS.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16357350&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1961
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care Information Systems
dc.subjectAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
dc.subject*Computers, Handheld
dc.subject*Decision Support Systems, Clinical
dc.subject*Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectGastrointestinal Diseases
dc.subjectHospitals, University
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMedication Errors
dc.subjectOutpatient Clinics, Hospital
dc.subject*Point-of-Care Systems
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleImproving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/797
dc.identifier.contextkey1426271
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing safety in the outpatient setting.</p> <p>DESIGN: The design was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in a university-based resident clinic. Internal medicine residents received a PDA-based CDSS suite. For intervention residents, the CDSS included a prediction rule for NSAID-related gastrointestinal risk assessment and treatment recommendations. Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray musculoskeletal symptoms presented to study physicians. Safety outcomes were assessed from the prescriptions given to the SPs. Each prescription was reviewed by a committee of clinicians blinded to participant, intervention group assignment, and baseline or follow-up status.</p> <p>MEASUREMENTS: Prescriptions were judged as safe or unsafe. The main outcome measure was the differential change in unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs for the intervention versus the control group.</p> <p>RESULTS: At baseline, the mean proportion of cases per physician with unsafe prescriptions for the two groups was similar (0.27 vs. 0.29, p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline performance, intervention participants prescribed more safely than controls after receiving the CDSS (0.23 vs. 0.45 [F = 4.24, p < 0.05]). With the CDSS, intervention participants documented more complete assessment of patient gastrointestinal risk from NSAIDs.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: PARTICIPANTS provided with a PDA-based CDSS for NSAID prescribing made fewer unsafe treatment decisions than participants without the CDSS.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/797
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages171-9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record