Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShatin, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorRawson, Nigel S.
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorBraun, M. Miles
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Carolyn K.
dc.contributor.authorMoreland, Larry W.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Angela F.
dc.contributor.authorPatkar, Nivedita M.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorSaag, Kenneth G.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:17:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:17:37Z
dc.date.issued2005-09-02
dc.date.submitted2010-08-05
dc.identifier.citationPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Jan;15(1):11-8. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.1132">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1053-8569 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.1132
dc.identifier.pmid16136625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47671
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Following its licensure, tuberculosis (TB) was reported as a potential adverse effect of infliximab. Subsequently, the product circular was changed to recommend tuberculin skin testing before patients received infliximab, which was reinforced by several risk communication efforts. The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns and predictors of documented tuberculin skin testing in patients before and after manufacturer, federal, and academic risk communications. METHODS: Patients administered infliximab were identified from 11 health plans located throughout the United States, and claims data were examined to determine whether the patients had received a tuberculin skin test. Patients were divided into three cohorts depending on the timing of their first infliximab treatment in relation to the risk communication efforts. RESULTS: The overall tuberculin skin testing rate doubled from 15.4% in the first cohort to 30.9% in the last cohort, while the rate of pre-infliximab treatment testing increased from 0 to 27.7% (Chi-squared test for trend, p < 0.0001 for both). Tuberculin skin testing rates were significantly higher in women, those with a diagnosis of rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis, and those with a rheumatologist as prescriber. After multivariable analysis, only rheumatologist remained significantly associated with tuberculin skin testing. CONCLUSIONS: Although the tuberculin skin testing rate was relatively low overall, tuberculin skin testing doubled over 30 months of ongoing risk communication efforts and under ascertainment likely occurred. We also found variation in the tuberculin skin testing rate associated with physician specialty. This study demonstrates a significant change in patient care following risk communication efforts.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16136625&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.1132
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal
dc.subjectAntirheumatic Agents
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Information Dissemination
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectRisk
dc.subjectTuberculin Test
dc.subjectTuberculosis, Pulmonary
dc.subjectTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleDocumented tuberculin skin testing among infliximab users following a multi-modal risk communication interventions
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/798
dc.identifier.contextkey1426272
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Following its licensure, tuberculosis (TB) was reported as a potential adverse effect of infliximab. Subsequently, the product circular was changed to recommend tuberculin skin testing before patients received infliximab, which was reinforced by several risk communication efforts. The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns and predictors of documented tuberculin skin testing in patients before and after manufacturer, federal, and academic risk communications.</p> <p>METHODS: Patients administered infliximab were identified from 11 health plans located throughout the United States, and claims data were examined to determine whether the patients had received a tuberculin skin test. Patients were divided into three cohorts depending on the timing of their first infliximab treatment in relation to the risk communication efforts.</p> <p>RESULTS: The overall tuberculin skin testing rate doubled from 15.4% in the first cohort to 30.9% in the last cohort, while the rate of pre-infliximab treatment testing increased from 0 to 27.7% (Chi-squared test for trend, p < 0.0001 for both). Tuberculin skin testing rates were significantly higher in women, those with a diagnosis of rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis, and those with a rheumatologist as prescriber. After multivariable analysis, only rheumatologist remained significantly associated with tuberculin skin testing.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Although the tuberculin skin testing rate was relatively low overall, tuberculin skin testing doubled over 30 months of ongoing risk communication efforts and under ascertainment likely occurred. We also found variation in the tuberculin skin testing rate associated with physician specialty. This study demonstrates a significant change in patient care following risk communication efforts.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/798
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages11-8


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record