Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support
dc.contributor.author | Ray, Midge N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Houston, Thomas K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Feliciano B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Menachemi, Nir | |
dc.contributor.author | Maisiak, Richard S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Allison, Jeroan J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Berner, Eta S. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:10:43.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T17:17:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T17:17:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-06-27 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):567-72. Epub 2006 Jun 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2096">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1067-5027 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1197/jamia.M2096 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16799120 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47681 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems. DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device. STATISTICS: Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability for the scale was alpha = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16799120&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2096 | |
dc.subject | Analysis of Variance | |
dc.subject | *Attitude of Health Personnel | |
dc.subject | *Attitude to Computers | |
dc.subject | *Computers, Handheld | |
dc.subject | *Decision Support Systems, Clinical | |
dc.subject | Evaluation Studies as Topic | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Physicians | |
dc.subject | *Psychometrics | |
dc.subject | Reproducibility of Results | |
dc.subject | Bioinformatics | |
dc.subject | Biostatistics | |
dc.subject | Epidemiology | |
dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
dc.title | Development and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA | |
dc.source.volume | 13 | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/807 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1426281 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>OBJECTIVE: The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems.</p> <p>DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device.</p> <p>STATISTICS: Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups.</p> <p>RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability for the scale was alpha = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | qhs_pp/807 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Quantitative Health Sciences | |
dc.source.pages | 567-72 |