Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRay, Midge N.
dc.contributor.authorHouston, Thomas K.
dc.contributor.authorYu, Feliciano B.
dc.contributor.authorMenachemi, Nir
dc.contributor.authorMaisiak, Richard S.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorBerner, Eta S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:17:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2006-06-27
dc.date.submitted2010-08-05
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):567-72. Epub 2006 Jun 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2096">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1067-5027 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1197/jamia.M2096
dc.identifier.pmid16799120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47681
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems. DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device. STATISTICS: Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability for the scale was alpha = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16799120&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2096
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subject*Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject*Attitude to Computers
dc.subject*Computers, Handheld
dc.subject*Decision Support Systems, Clinical
dc.subjectEvaluation Studies as Topic
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subject*Psychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleDevelopment and testing of a scale to assess physician attitudes about handheld computers with decision support
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/807
dc.identifier.contextkey1426281
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems.</p> <p>DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device.</p> <p>STATISTICS: Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups.</p> <p>RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability for the scale was alpha = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/807
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages567-72


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record