Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHartig, Jason R.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:17:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-29
dc.date.submitted2010-08-05
dc.identifier.citationClin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):50-4.
dc.identifier.issn0392-856X (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid18021507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47696
dc.description.abstractAs the science and study of medicine has continued to evolve over the last 30 years, the concept of physician performance has not only taken shape, but risen to the forefront of our daily practice. "Pay-for-performance," "quality," "audit" and "computerized-care" are terms we recognize and use ever more frequently. Yet, as we strive to improve our care, we have failed to identify a single or best method for translating the growing body of knowledge into regular practice. Multiple methods exist, including evidence-based guidelines, continuing medical education conferences, academic detailing, opinion leaders, audit and feedback, public reporting, pay-for-performance, and computer-based reminder systems. Each method holds potential to improve performance. As attempts are continually made to change the care provided, we should be mindful to ensure that these measures actually improve our performance and our patients' lives.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=18021507&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.clinexprheumatol.org/article.asp?a=3179
dc.subjectClinical Audit
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Continuing
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMedical Records Systems, Computerized
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subjectProfessional Practice
dc.subjectReimbursement, Incentive
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titlePhysician performance improvement: an overview of methodologies
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleClinical and experimental rheumatology
dc.source.volume25
dc.source.issue6 Suppl 47
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/820
dc.identifier.contextkey1426294
html.description.abstract<p>As the science and study of medicine has continued to evolve over the last 30 years, the concept of physician performance has not only taken shape, but risen to the forefront of our daily practice. "Pay-for-performance," "quality," "audit" and "computerized-care" are terms we recognize and use ever more frequently. Yet, as we strive to improve our care, we have failed to identify a single or best method for translating the growing body of knowledge into regular practice. Multiple methods exist, including evidence-based guidelines, continuing medical education conferences, academic detailing, opinion leaders, audit and feedback, public reporting, pay-for-performance, and computer-based reminder systems. Each method holds potential to improve performance. As attempts are continually made to change the care provided, we should be mindful to ensure that these measures actually improve our performance and our patients' lives.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/820
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages50-4


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record