Increased regimen durability in the era of once-daily fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy
Authors
Willig, James H.Abroms, Sarah
Westfall, Andrew O.
Routman, Justin
Adusumilli, Sunil
Varshney, Mohit
Allison, Jeroan J.
Chatham, Ashlee
Raper, James L
Kaslow, Richard A.
Saag, Michael S.
Mugavero, Michael J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-09-12Keywords
AdultAnti-HIV Agents
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Drug Administration Schedule
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
HIV Infections
HIV Protease Inhibitors
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Bioinformatics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Data on initial antiretroviral regimen longevity predates the arrival of newer nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones and once-daily regimens. Modern regimens are thought to possess greater tolerability and convenience. We hypothesized this would translate into greater durability. METHODS: Retrospective study of antiretroviral-naive patients starting treatment at the University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic 1 January 2000-31 July 2007. Two periods of antiretroviral initiation were identified, prior and after August 2004 (arrival of once-daily fixed-dose regimens). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of regimen durability by time period and regimen characteristics were performed. Staged Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the roles of dosing complexity and composition in explaining differences in regimen durability between study periods. RESULTS: Overall 542 patients started antiretroviral drugs (n = 309, January 2000-July 2004; n = 233, August 2004-July 2007). Median durability was 263 days longer in after August 2004 regimens. Regimens started before August 2004 had increased hazards for discontinuation relative to after August 2004 regimens [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-2.02]. Time period of initiation lost statistical significance when the model included dosing frequency (HR = 1.92 for at least twice daily vs. daily; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88). As regimen composition variables were added, time period and dosing frequency lost significance. Increased hazards of discontinuation were observed with didanosine or stavudine relative to abacavir or tenofovir use (HR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.29-2.88) and all third drugs compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens (triple-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor HR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.14-2.73; unboosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.02-2.46; boosted-protease inhibitor HR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02-2.41). Affective mental health disorders increased the hazard of discontinuation in all models. CONCLUSION: Durability of contemporary once-daily fixed-dose antiretroviral regimens has significantly eclipsed the duration of earlier antiretroviral drug options. Our results indicate this is due to both more convenient dosing and improved tolerability of modern antiretroviral regimens.Source
AIDS. 2008 Oct 1;22(15):1951-60. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830efd79Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47699PubMed ID
18784459Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830efd79