Administrative codes combined with medical records based criteria accurately identified bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis patients
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Patkar, Nivedita M.Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Teng, Gim Gee
Allison, Jeroan J.
Saag, Michael S.
Martin, Carolyn K.
Saag, Kenneth G.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-10-07Keywords
AgedArthritis, Rheumatoid
Bacterial Infections
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Forms and Records Control
Humans
International Classification of Diseases
Male
Medical Records
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Bioinformatics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic properties of International Classification of Diseases, Version 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and infection criteria to identify bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a cross-sectional study of RA patients with and without ICD-9 codes for bacterial infections. Sixteen bacterial infection criteria were developed. Diagnostic properties of comprehensive and restrictive sets of ICD-9 codes and the infection criteria were tested against an adjudicated review of medical records. RESULTS: Records on 162 RA patients with and 50 without purported bacterial infections were reviewed. Positive and negative predictive values of ICD-9 codes ranged from 54%-85% and 84%-100%, respectively. Positive predictive values of the medical records based criteria were 84% and 89% for "definite" and "definite or empirically treated" infections, respectively. Positive predictive value of infection criteria increased by 50% as disease prevalence increased using ICD-9 codes to enhance infection likelihood. CONCLUSION: ICD-9 codes alone may misclassify bacterial infections in hospitalized RA patients. Misclassification varies with the specificity of the codes used and strength of evidence required to confirm infections. Combining ICD-9 codes with infection criteria identified infections with greatest accuracy. Novel infection criteria may limit the requirement to review medical records.Source
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):321-7, 327.e1-7. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.006Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47709PubMed ID
18834713Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.006