• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs, and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Departments, Programs, and Centers
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    • Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Do physicians within the same practice setting manage osteoporosis patients similarly? Implications for implementation research

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Arora, T.
    Xi, J.
    Silver, A.
    Allison, Jeroan J.
    Chen, L.
    Saag, Kenneth G.
    Schenck, Anna P.
    Westfall, Andrew O.
    Colon-Emeric, Cathleen S.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2009-03-26
    Keywords
    Osteoporosis
    Physician's Practice Patterns
    Bioinformatics
    Biostatistics
    Epidemiology
    Health Services Research
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0900-7
    Abstract
    Using data from long-term glucocorticoid users and long-term care residents, we evaluated osteoporosis prescribing patterns related to physician behavior and common practice settings. We found no significant clustering effect for common practice setting, suggesting that osteoporosis quality improvement (QI) efforts may be able to ignore this factor in designing QI interventions. INTRODUCTION: Patients' receipt of prescription therapies are significantly influenced by their physician's prescribing patterns. If physicians in the same practice setting influence one another's prescribing, evidence implementation interventions must consider targeting the practice as well as individual physicians to achieve maximal success. METHODS: We examined receipt of osteoporosis treatment (OP Rx) from two prior evidence implementation studies: long-term glucocorticoid (GC) users and nursing home (NH) residents with prior fracture or osteoporosis. Common practice setting was defined as doctors practicing at the same address or in the same nursing home. Alternating logistic regression evaluated the relationship between OP Rx, common practice setting, and individual physician treatment patterns. RESULTS: Among 6,281 GC users in 1,296 practices, the proportion receiving OP Rx in each practice was 6-100%. Among 779 NH residents in 66 nursing homes, the proportion in each NH receiving OP Rx was 0-100%. In both, there was no significant relationship between receipt of OP Rx and common practice setting after accounting for treatment pattern of individual physicians. CONCLUSION: Physicians practicing together were not more alike in prescribing osteoporosis medications than those in different practices. Osteoporosis quality improvement may be able to ignore common practice settings and maximize statistical power by targeting individual physicians.
    Source
    Osteoporos Int. 2009 Nov;20(11):1921-7. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Link to article on publisher's site
    DOI
    10.1007/s00198-009-0900-7
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47713
    PubMed ID
    19319619
    Related Resources
    Link to Article in PubMed
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s00198-009-0900-7
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.