Authors
Blendon, Robert J.DesRoches, Catherine M.
Brodie, Mollyann
Benson, John M.
Rosen, Allison B.
Schneider, Eric
Altman, Drew E.
Zapert, Kinga
Herrmann, Melissa J.
Steffenson, Annie E.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2002-12-13Keywords
*Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to Health
Data Collection
Hospital Administration
Hospital Mortality
*Medical Errors
Nursing
*Physicians
*Public Opinion
Questionnaires
Time Factors
United States
Work Schedule Tolerance
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: In response to the report by the Institute of Medicine on medical errors, national groups have recommended actions to reduce the occurrence of preventable medical errors. What is not known is the level of support for these proposed changes among practicing physicians and the public. METHODS: We conducted parallel national surveys of 831 practicing physicians, who responded to mailed questionnaires, and 1207 members of the public, who were interviewed by telephone after selection with the use of random-digit dialing. Respondents were asked about the causes of and solutions to the problem of preventable medical errors and, on the basis of a clinical vignette, were asked what the consequences of an error should be. RESULTS: Many physicians (35 percent) and members of the public (42 percent) reported errors in their own or a family member's care, but neither group viewed medical errors as one of the most important problems in health care today. A majority of both groups believed that the number of in-hospital deaths due to preventable errors is lower than that reported by the Institute of Medicine. Physicians and the public disagreed on many of the underlying causes of errors and on effective strategies for reducing errors. Neither group believed that moving patients to high-volume centers would be a very effective strategy. The public and many physicians supported the use of sanctions against individual health professionals perceived as responsible for serious errors. CONCLUSIONS: Though substantial proportions of the public and practicing physicians report that they have had personal experience with medical errors, neither group has the sense of urgency expressed by many national organizations. To advance their agenda, national groups need to convince physicians, in particular, that the current proposals for reducing errors will be very effective.Source
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 12;347(24):1933-40. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1056/NEJMsa022151Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47769PubMed ID
12477944Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1056/NEJMsa022151