Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBowers, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorKiefe, Catarina I.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:44.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:18:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2002-08-03
dc.date.submitted2010-04-27
dc.identifier.citationAm J Med Qual. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):136-44.
dc.identifier.issn1062-8606 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid12153066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47858
dc.description.abstractHealth care quality, a key concept for medical practice and research, is also a widely used construct in health care administration and marketing research. We explored discipline-specific differences in the definition of quality, with the intent of finding a more unified approach. We summarized definitions and basic conceptual approaches to quality in both disciplines and then compared them on several attributes: basic goals, sources of measurement, role of patient perceptions, role of health care personnel, and need for risk adjustment. We developed a conceptual model combining the 2 approaches. Both disciplines could benefit from broadening their outcome measures. Patient satisfaction deserves more attention from medical researchers, whereas marketing approaches should go beyond using patient satisfaction as the only outcome of interest. It is conceptually feasible to integrate medical and marketing approaches to quality, with important insights resulting from this integration.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=12153066&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106286060201700403
dc.subjectConsumer Satisfaction
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Marketing of Health Services
dc.subject*Patient Satisfaction
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Care
dc.subjectQuality Indicators, Health Care
dc.subject*Treatment Outcome
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectBiostatistics
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleMeasuring health care quality: comparing and contrasting the medical and the marketing approaches
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAmerican journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
dc.source.volume17
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/qhs_pp/97
dc.identifier.contextkey1287842
html.description.abstract<p>Health care quality, a key concept for medical practice and research, is also a widely used construct in health care administration and marketing research. We explored discipline-specific differences in the definition of quality, with the intent of finding a more unified approach. We summarized definitions and basic conceptual approaches to quality in both disciplines and then compared them on several attributes: basic goals, sources of measurement, role of patient perceptions, role of health care personnel, and need for risk adjustment. We developed a conceptual model combining the 2 approaches. Both disciplines could benefit from broadening their outcome measures. Patient satisfaction deserves more attention from medical researchers, whereas marketing approaches should go beyond using patient satisfaction as the only outcome of interest. It is conceptually feasible to integrate medical and marketing approaches to quality, with important insights resulting from this integration.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathqhs_pp/97
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.source.pages136-44


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record