We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
A web-based diabetes intervention for physician: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial
Authors
Estrada, Carlos A.Safford, Monika M.
Salanitro, Amanda H.
Houston, Thomas K.
Curry, William
Williams, Jessica H.
Ovalle, Fernando
Kim, Yongin
Foster, Pamela
Allison, Jeroan J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2011-12-13Keywords
Diabetes MellitusInternet
Biostatistics
Endocrine System Diseases
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Medical Education
Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a provider-based education and implementation intervention for improving diabetes control. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized trial with baseline and follow-up cross sections of diabetes patients in each participating physician's practice. SETTING: Eleven US Southeastern states, 2006-08. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and five rural primary care physicians. INTERVENTION: Multi-component interactive intervention including Web-based continuing medical education, performance feedback and quality improvement tools. Primary Outcome Measures 'Acceptable control' [hemoglobin A1c≤9%, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) <130 mg/dl] and 'optimal control' (A1c <7%, BP <130/80 mmHg, LDL <100 mg/dl). RESULTS: Of 364 physicians attempting to register, 205 were randomized to the intervention (n= 102) or control arms (n= 103). Baseline and follow-up data were provided by 95 physicians (2127 patients). The proportion of patients with A1c ≤9% was similar at baseline and follow-up in both the control [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.47] and intervention arms [AOR: 1.16 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.69)]; BP <140/90 mmHg and LDL <130 mg/dl were also similar at both measurement points (P= 0.66, P= 0.46; respectively). We observed no significant effect on diabetes control attributable to the intervention for any of the primary outcome measures. Intervention physicians engaged with the Website over a median of 64.7 weeks [interquartile range (IQR): 45.4-81.8) for a median total of 37 min (IQR: 16-66). CONCLUSIONS: A wide-reach, low-intensity, Web-based interactive multi-component intervention did not improve control of glucose, BP or lipids for patients with diabetes of physicians practicing in the rural Southeastern US.Source
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Dec;23(6):682-9. Epub 2011 Aug 10. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr053DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzr053Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47887PubMed ID
21831967Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/intqhc/mzr053