Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteingisser, Lee
dc.contributor.authorAcker, Brian
dc.contributor.authorBerman, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorBrenner, Mark J.
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Bruce A.
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Paul
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Joseph O.
dc.contributor.authorJekowsky, Eliot
dc.contributor.authorKachnic, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorMamon, Harvey
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorShulman, Lawrence N.
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Mary Ann.
dc.contributor.authorWazer, David
dc.contributor.authorFallon, John A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:46.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:18:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:18:56Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.date.submitted2015-10-26
dc.identifier.citationJ Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e321-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001473. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001473">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1554-7477 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JOP.2014.001473
dc.identifier.pmid25232190
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47965
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) limits the dose of radiation to critical normal tissue structures and can be applied to the management of most cancers treated with radiation therapy. Because of increased treatment planning time and quality assurance, IMRT is costly. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and the Massachusetts Radiation Oncology Physicians Advisory Council (PAC) developed a strategy to develop standards for the appropriate use of IMRT. METHODS: Normal tissue volume guidelines were established in multiple oncology disease areas and body site regions. Guidelines were activated in September 2011, and the use of IMRT per case was tracked quarterly by BCBSMA staff. RESULTS: During the first year of activation of the volume-based guidelines, use of IMRT decreased by 17% in Massachusetts, in contrast to a 20% increase during the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: The normal tissue-based guidelines have decreased the use of IMRT in Massachusetts; increased the use of 3D treatment; continued communication between treating radiation oncologists and an insurance organization responsible for cost and quality in medicine; increased cost savings; enabled an efficient appeal process; and provided optimal, cost-effective patient care. This may prove to be an effective model for other disciplines and other developing and maturing radiation technologies.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25232190&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001473
dc.subject*Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans
dc.subjectCooperative Behavior
dc.subjectHealth Care Costs
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
dc.subjectReimbursement Mechanisms
dc.subjectHealth and Medical Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titleBending the cost curve: a unique collaboration between radiation oncologists and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts to optimize the use of advanced technology
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of oncology practice / American Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiationoncology_pubs/73
dc.identifier.contextkey7762705
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) limits the dose of radiation to critical normal tissue structures and can be applied to the management of most cancers treated with radiation therapy. Because of increased treatment planning time and quality assurance, IMRT is costly. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and the Massachusetts Radiation Oncology Physicians Advisory Council (PAC) developed a strategy to develop standards for the appropriate use of IMRT.</p> <p>METHODS: Normal tissue volume guidelines were established in multiple oncology disease areas and body site regions. Guidelines were activated in September 2011, and the use of IMRT per case was tracked quarterly by BCBSMA staff.</p> <p>RESULTS: During the first year of activation of the volume-based guidelines, use of IMRT decreased by 17% in Massachusetts, in contrast to a 20% increase during the previous year.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The normal tissue-based guidelines have decreased the use of IMRT in Massachusetts; increased the use of 3D treatment; continued communication between treating radiation oncologists and an insurance organization responsible for cost and quality in medicine; increased cost savings; enabled an efficient appeal process; and provided optimal, cost-effective patient care. This may prove to be an effective model for other disciplines and other developing and maturing radiation technologies.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiationoncology_pubs/73
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology
dc.source.pagese321-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record