Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEbner, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRava, Paul
dc.contributor.authorGorovets, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCielo, Deus
dc.contributor.authorHepel, Jaroslaw T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:46.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:18:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-01
dc.date.submitted2015-11-16
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Neurosci. 2015 Oct;22(10):1650-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jul 22. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.019">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0967-5868 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.019
dc.identifier.pmid26209921
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47969
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated patient outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-treatment of large brain metastasis (3cm) at our institution. SRS is an established treatment for limited brain metastases. However, large tumors pose a challenge for this approach. For this study, 343 patients with 754 total brain metastases were treated with SRS, of which 93 had large tumors. The tumor size was 3-3.5, 3.5-4, and 4cm in 29%, 32%, and 39% of these patients. Surgical resection was performed prior to SRS in 68% of patients, and 53% achieved a gross total resection. The local control of large metastases was inferior compared to smaller tumors, with 1 year local control of 68 versus 86%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among the patients with large metastases, no correlation between local control and surgical resection (p=0.747), or extent of surgery (gross total versus subtotal resection; p=0.120), was identified. Histology (p=0.939), tumor size (3-4 versus > 4cm; p=0.551), and SRS dose (16 versus > 16Gy; p=0.539) also showed no correlation with local failure. The overall survival at 1, 2, and 5years was 46%, 29% and 5%, respectively. Prolonged survival was seen in patients with age < 65years (p=0.009), primary treatment compared with salvage (p=0.077), and controlled primary tumors (p=0.022). Radiation necrosis developed in 10 patients (11.8%). For patients with large brain metastases, SRS is well tolerated and can achieve local central nervous system disease control in the majority of patients, and extended survival in some, though the local control rate is suboptimal. Further strategies to improve the outcomes in this subgroup of patients are needed.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26209921&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.019
dc.subjectBrain metastasis
dc.subjectGamma Knife radiosurgery
dc.subjectLarge metastasis
dc.subjectStereotactic radiosurgery
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleStereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiationoncology_pubs/78
dc.identifier.contextkey7846774
html.description.abstract<p>We evaluated patient outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-treatment of large brain metastasis (3cm) at our institution. SRS is an established treatment for limited brain metastases. However, large tumors pose a challenge for this approach. For this study, 343 patients with 754 total brain metastases were treated with SRS, of which 93 had large tumors. The tumor size was 3-3.5, 3.5-4, and 4cm in 29%, 32%, and 39% of these patients. Surgical resection was performed prior to SRS in 68% of patients, and 53% achieved a gross total resection. The local control of large metastases was inferior compared to smaller tumors, with 1 year local control of 68 versus 86%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among the patients with large metastases, no correlation between local control and surgical resection (p=0.747), or extent of surgery (gross total versus subtotal resection; p=0.120), was identified. Histology (p=0.939), tumor size (3-4 versus > 4cm; p=0.551), and SRS dose (16 versus > 16Gy; p=0.539) also showed no correlation with local failure. The overall survival at 1, 2, and 5years was 46%, 29% and 5%, respectively. Prolonged survival was seen in patients with age < 65years (p=0.009), primary treatment compared with salvage (p=0.077), and controlled primary tumors (p=0.022). Radiation necrosis developed in 10 patients (11.8%). For patients with large brain metastases, SRS is well tolerated and can achieve local central nervous system disease control in the majority of patients, and extended survival in some, though the local control rate is suboptimal. Further strategies to improve the outcomes in this subgroup of patients are needed.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiationoncology_pubs/78
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology
dc.source.pages1650-4


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record