Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Kara Lynne
dc.contributor.authorRivard, Mark J.
dc.contributor.authorWazer, David E.
dc.contributor.authorHiatt, Jessica R.
dc.contributor.authorSioshansi, Shirin
dc.contributor.authorDiPetrillo, Thomas A.
dc.contributor.authorHepel, Jaroslaw T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:46.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:18:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-01
dc.date.submitted2015-11-16
dc.identifier.citationBrachytherapy. 2015 Jul-Aug;14(4):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 18. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.03.007">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1538-4721 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brachy.2015.03.007
dc.identifier.pmid25900392
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/47970
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) is an attractive novel approach to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Calculations of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) were performed to identify the appropriate APBI dose for this technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: APBI plans were developed for 15 patients: five with three-dimensional conformal APBI (3D-CRT), five with multi-lumen intracavitary balloons (m-IBB), and five simulating NIBB treatment. Prescription doses of 34.0 and 38.5 Gy were delivered in 10 fractions for m-IBB and 3D-CRT, respectively. Prescription doses ranging from 34.0 to 38.5 Gy were considered for NIBB. Dose-volume histogram data from all 3D-CRT, m-IBB, and NIBB plans were used to calculate the biologically effective EUD and corresponding EUD to the PTV_eval using the following equation: EUD = EUBED/(n [1 + EUD/alpha/beta]). An alpha/beta value of 4.6 Gy was assumed for breast tumor. EUD for varying NIBB prescription doses were compared with EUD values for the other APBI techniques. RESULTS: Mean PTV_eval volume was largest for 3D-CRT (372.9 cm(3)) and was similar for NIBB and m-IBB (88.7 and 87.2 cm(3), respectively). The EUD value obtained by prescribing 38.5 Gy with 3D-CRT APBI was 38.6 Gy. The EUD value of 34.0 Gy prescribed with m-IBB was 34.4 Gy. EUD values for NIBB ranged from 33.9 to 38.2 Gy for prescription doses ranging from 34.0 to 38.5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Using EUD calculations to compare APBI techniques and treatment doses, a prescription dose of 36.0 Gy in 10 fractions using NIBB has a comparable biologic equivalent dose to other established brachytherapy techniques.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25900392&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.03.007
dc.subjectAPBI
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectEUD
dc.subjectNIBB
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titlePrescription dose evaluation for APBI with noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy using equivalent uniform dose
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBrachytherapy
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiationoncology_pubs/79
dc.identifier.contextkey7846775
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) is an attractive novel approach to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Calculations of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) were performed to identify the appropriate APBI dose for this technique.</p> <p>METHODS AND MATERIALS: APBI plans were developed for 15 patients: five with three-dimensional conformal APBI (3D-CRT), five with multi-lumen intracavitary balloons (m-IBB), and five simulating NIBB treatment. Prescription doses of 34.0 and 38.5 Gy were delivered in 10 fractions for m-IBB and 3D-CRT, respectively. Prescription doses ranging from 34.0 to 38.5 Gy were considered for NIBB. Dose-volume histogram data from all 3D-CRT, m-IBB, and NIBB plans were used to calculate the biologically effective EUD and corresponding EUD to the PTV_eval using the following equation: EUD = EUBED/(n [1 + EUD/alpha/beta]). An alpha/beta value of 4.6 Gy was assumed for breast tumor. EUD for varying NIBB prescription doses were compared with EUD values for the other APBI techniques.</p> <p>RESULTS: Mean PTV_eval volume was largest for 3D-CRT (372.9 cm(3)) and was similar for NIBB and m-IBB (88.7 and 87.2 cm(3), respectively). The EUD value obtained by prescribing 38.5 Gy with 3D-CRT APBI was 38.6 Gy. The EUD value of 34.0 Gy prescribed with m-IBB was 34.4 Gy. EUD values for NIBB ranged from 33.9 to 38.2 Gy for prescription doses ranging from 34.0 to 38.5 Gy.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Using EUD calculations to compare APBI techniques and treatment doses, a prescription dose of 36.0 Gy in 10 fractions using NIBB has a comparable biologic equivalent dose to other established brachytherapy techniques.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiationoncology_pubs/79
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology
dc.source.pages496-501


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record