Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan der Marel, Kajo
dc.contributor.authorVedantham, Srinivasan
dc.contributor.authorvan der Bom, I. M. J.
dc.contributor.authorHowk, Mary
dc.contributor.authorNarain, T.
dc.contributor.authorTy, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorKarellas, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorGounis, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.contributor.authorWakhloo, Ajay K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:46.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:19:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:19:32Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.date.submitted2017-05-04
dc.identifier.citationAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Mar;38(3):442-449. Epub 2017 Jan 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5049">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A5049
dc.identifier.pmid28104643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48098
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advancements in medical device and imaging technology as well as accruing clinical evidence have accelerated the growth of the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the augmented role of these procedures raises concerns about the radiation dose to patients and operators. We evaluated patient doses from an x-ray imaging platform with radiation dose-reduction technology, which combined image noise reduction, motion correction, and contrast-dependent temporal averaging with optimized x-ray exposure settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, cumulative dose-area product inclusive of fluoroscopy, angiography, and 3D acquisitions for all neurovascular procedures performed during a 2-year period on the dose-reduction platform were compared with a reference platform. Key study features were the following: The neurointerventional radiologist could select the targeted dose reduction for each patient with the dose-reduction platform, and the statistical analyses included patient characteristics and the neurointerventional radiologist as covariates. The analyzed outcome measures were cumulative dose (kerma)-area product, fluoroscopy duration, and administered contrast volume. RESULTS: A total of 1238 neurointerventional cases were included, of which 914 and 324 were performed on the reference and dose-reduction platforms, respectively. Over all diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures, the cumulative dose-area product was significantly reduced by 53.2% (mean reduction, 160.3 Gy x cm2; P < .0001), fluoroscopy duration was marginally significantly increased (mean increase, 5.2 minutes; P = .0491), and contrast volume was nonsignificantly increased (mean increase, 15.3 mL; P = .1616) with the dose-reduction platform. CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in patient radiation dose is achievable during neurovascular procedures by using dose-reduction technology with a minimal impact on workflow.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=28104643&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5049
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleReduced Patient Radiation Exposure during Neurodiagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Angiography with a New Imaging Platform
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
dc.source.volume38
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/201
dc.identifier.contextkey10119523
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advancements in medical device and imaging technology as well as accruing clinical evidence have accelerated the growth of the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the augmented role of these procedures raises concerns about the radiation dose to patients and operators. We evaluated patient doses from an x-ray imaging platform with radiation dose-reduction technology, which combined image noise reduction, motion correction, and contrast-dependent temporal averaging with optimized x-ray exposure settings.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, cumulative dose-area product inclusive of fluoroscopy, angiography, and 3D acquisitions for all neurovascular procedures performed during a 2-year period on the dose-reduction platform were compared with a reference platform. Key study features were the following: The neurointerventional radiologist could select the targeted dose reduction for each patient with the dose-reduction platform, and the statistical analyses included patient characteristics and the neurointerventional radiologist as covariates. The analyzed outcome measures were cumulative dose (kerma)-area product, fluoroscopy duration, and administered contrast volume.</p> <p>RESULTS: A total of 1238 neurointerventional cases were included, of which 914 and 324 were performed on the reference and dose-reduction platforms, respectively. Over all diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures, the cumulative dose-area product was significantly reduced by 53.2% (mean reduction, 160.3 Gy x cm2; P < .0001), fluoroscopy duration was marginally significantly increased (mean increase, 5.2 minutes; P = .0491), and contrast volume was nonsignificantly increased (mean increase, 15.3 mL; P = .1616) with the dose-reduction platform.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in patient radiation dose is achievable during neurovascular procedures by using dose-reduction technology with a minimal impact on workflow.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/201
dc.contributor.departmentNew England Center for Stroke Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages442-449


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record