Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorKan, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMassi, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Juan Diego
dc.contributor.authorHou, Samuel Y.
dc.contributor.authorHowk, Mary
dc.contributor.authorGounis, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorWakhloo, Ajay K.
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:46.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:19:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.date.submitted2017-05-15
dc.identifier.citationJ Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Oct;8(10):1048-51. Epub 2015 Nov 6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012028">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1759-8478 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012028
dc.identifier.pmid26546600
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48115
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery (VA) are difficult to treat using current surgical and endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE: To analyze retrospectively the efficacy and safety of flow diverters in the treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery. METHODS: We identified six patients with six unruptured VA dissecting aneurysms either arising from the V4 or V3-V4 junction that were treated with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) at our institution between July 2012 and February 2015. Among other parameters, technical feasibility of the procedure, procedure-related complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: PED placement was achieved in all cases and immediate angiography follow-up demonstrated intra-aneurysmal contrast stasis with parent artery preservation. A temporary episode of dysarthria was noted in one patient. Major procedure-related complications were not observed. The 6-month follow-up (n=6) demonstrated complete/near-complete aneurysm obliteration in five patients and partial obliteration in one. At the 1-year follow-up (n=5) stable complete aneurysm occlusion was seen in two patients. Two cases showed progression from near complete occlusion and partial occlusion at 6 months to complete occlusion and near complete occlusion. One cases showed unchanged near complete occlusion. No aneurysmal bleeding, in-stent stenosis or thromboembolic complication was seen. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin scale scores remained unchanged from admission to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with the use of PED for the treatment of intradural VA dissecting aneurysms shows promising short-term results, making this technique a feasible and safe treatment option in patients suitable for this approach. However, long-term and larger cohort studies are needed to validate these results.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26546600&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012028
dc.subjectAneurysm
dc.subjectDissection
dc.subjectFlow Diverter
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectNervous System Diseases
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleEndovascular reconstruction of unruptured intradural vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of neurointerventional surgery
dc.source.volume8
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/220
dc.identifier.contextkey10166365
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery (VA) are difficult to treat using current surgical and endovascular techniques.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To analyze retrospectively the efficacy and safety of flow diverters in the treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the vertebral artery.</p> <p>METHODS: We identified six patients with six unruptured VA dissecting aneurysms either arising from the V4 or V3-V4 junction that were treated with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) at our institution between July 2012 and February 2015. Among other parameters, technical feasibility of the procedure, procedure-related complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcome were evaluated.</p> <p>RESULTS: PED placement was achieved in all cases and immediate angiography follow-up demonstrated intra-aneurysmal contrast stasis with parent artery preservation. A temporary episode of dysarthria was noted in one patient. Major procedure-related complications were not observed. The 6-month follow-up (n=6) demonstrated complete/near-complete aneurysm obliteration in five patients and partial obliteration in one. At the 1-year follow-up (n=5) stable complete aneurysm occlusion was seen in two patients. Two cases showed progression from near complete occlusion and partial occlusion at 6 months to complete occlusion and near complete occlusion. One cases showed unchanged near complete occlusion. No aneurysmal bleeding, in-stent stenosis or thromboembolic complication was seen. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin scale scores remained unchanged from admission to discharge.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with the use of PED for the treatment of intradural VA dissecting aneurysms shows promising short-term results, making this technique a feasible and safe treatment option in patients suitable for this approach. However, long-term and larger cohort studies are needed to validate these results.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/220
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.contributor.departmentNew England Center for Stroke Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages1048-51


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record