Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChueh, Juyu
dc.contributor.authorWakhloo, Ajay K.
dc.contributor.authorGounis, Matthew J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:47.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:19:52Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:19:52Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.date.submitted2017-06-07
dc.identifier.citationAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Nov;33(10):1998-2003 2012 May 3. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3103">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A3103
dc.identifier.pmid22555570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48177
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A number of thrombectomy devices are currently undergoing clinical evaluation; meanwhile, various novel devices are under investigation. The aims of this study were to quantify flow restoration and the particle size distribution of the effluent pursuant to MET in an in vitro occlusion model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model system was composed of 3 elements: an ICA/MCA replica, a clot model with mechanical properties similar to those of thrombi found in patients at risk of stroke, and a pulsatile flow loop. Different thrombectomy mechanisms including mechanical retrieval, aspiration, and waveguide induced cavitation were used. The efficacy end points were recanalization rate and amount of flow restoration. The risk of the embolic shower was assessed to evaluate device safety. RESULTS: The recanalization rates were the following: Merci, 67%; Solitaire, 100%; Penumbra, 83%; Enterprise, 17%; and the waveguide, 0%. In experiments in which recanalization was achieved, the amount of flow restoration for the Merci, Solitaire, and Enterprise devices was 100%, 92%, and 86%, respectively. The mean sizes of generated small and large clot fragments were between 23 and 37 and 215 and 285 mum, respectively, depending on the device used. The Merci device generated the fewest number of large fragments compared with the Penumbra system (P < .05) and Solitaire (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of embolic shower was influenced by the mechanism of action for the thrombectomy device. Clinically reported recanalization rates for the Solitaire, Penumbra, and Merci devices were nearly identical in this model system, suggesting that this model may provide a predictive tool for preclinical evaluation of MET.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=22555570&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3103
dc.rightsOpen access. © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology. Publisher PDF posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.ajnr.org/page/content/Information-for-Authors.
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleEffectiveness of mechanical endovascular thrombectomy in a model system of cerebrovascular occlusion
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
dc.source.volume33
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1304&amp;context=radiology_pubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/294
dc.identifier.contextkey10265309
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T17:19:53Z
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A number of thrombectomy devices are currently undergoing clinical evaluation; meanwhile, various novel devices are under investigation. The aims of this study were to quantify flow restoration and the particle size distribution of the effluent pursuant to MET in an in vitro occlusion model.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model system was composed of 3 elements: an ICA/MCA replica, a clot model with mechanical properties similar to those of thrombi found in patients at risk of stroke, and a pulsatile flow loop. Different thrombectomy mechanisms including mechanical retrieval, aspiration, and waveguide induced cavitation were used. The efficacy end points were recanalization rate and amount of flow restoration. The risk of the embolic shower was assessed to evaluate device safety.</p> <p>RESULTS: The recanalization rates were the following: Merci, 67%; Solitaire, 100%; Penumbra, 83%; Enterprise, 17%; and the waveguide, 0%. In experiments in which recanalization was achieved, the amount of flow restoration for the Merci, Solitaire, and Enterprise devices was 100%, 92%, and 86%, respectively. The mean sizes of generated small and large clot fragments were between 23 and 37 and 215 and 285 mum, respectively, depending on the device used. The Merci device generated the fewest number of large fragments compared with the Penumbra system (P < .05) and Solitaire (not significant).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The risk of embolic shower was influenced by the mechanism of action for the thrombectomy device. Clinically reported recanalization rates for the Solitaire, Penumbra, and Merci devices were nearly identical in this model system, suggesting that this model may provide a predictive tool for preclinical evaluation of MET.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/294
dc.contributor.departmentNew England Center for Stroke Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages1998-2003


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AJNR_Chueh_1998.full.pdf
Size:
1.767Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record