Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Macedo Rodrigues, Katyucia
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Anna L.
dc.contributor.authorTamura, Takamitsu
dc.contributor.authorDabus, Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorKan, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMarosfoi, Miklos G.
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Juan Diego
dc.contributor.authorPerras, Mary
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorHowk, Mary
dc.contributor.authorHou, Samuel Y.
dc.contributor.authorRex, David E.
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorGounis, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorWakhloo, Ajay K.
dc.contributor.authorPuri, Ajit S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:10:47.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T17:19:59Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T17:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-17
dc.date.submitted2017-06-19
dc.identifier.citationOper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 May 17. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx111. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx111">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn2332-4260 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ons/opx111
dc.identifier.pmid28521024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48203
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Pericallosal artery aneurysm treatment may be challenging using traditional endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment of pericallosal artery aneurysm using flow diverters. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database from July 2013 through July 2016 and identified 7 subjects with a pericallosal artery aneurysm treated with the Pipeline embolization device (ev3 Neurovascular, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and at least 1 follow-up angiogram. Technical feasibility, procedural complication, angiographic results, and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Placement of the Pipeline embolization device was successful in all cases without evidence of procedural complication. Five out of 7 subjects showed a complete aneurysm occlusion at 6- to 12-mo follow-up angiogram. The 2 subjects with persistent aneurysm filling showed decreased aneurysm sac volume on follow-up angiograms (96% and 60%). There was no evidence of in-implant stenosis or intimal hyperplasia. No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications were seen during the follow-up period. Only 1 patient had a transient change in Modified Rankin scale score from baseline as a result of different unrelated procedure. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrate feasibility of the use of flow diverter stent for treatment of aneurysms of the pericallosal artery with rate of aneurysm occlusion comparable to literature and without evidence of increased procedural or short-term morbidity. A long-term and larger cohort study is needed to validate our findings.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=28521024&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx111
dc.subjectaneurysm
dc.subjectartery
dc.subjectflow diverter
dc.subjectpericallosal
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titlePipeline Embolization Device for Pericallosal Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Single Center Safety and Efficacy Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/319
dc.identifier.contextkey10320227
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Pericallosal artery aneurysm treatment may be challenging using traditional endovascular techniques.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment of pericallosal artery aneurysm using flow diverters.</p> <p>METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database from July 2013 through July 2016 and identified 7 subjects with a pericallosal artery aneurysm treated with the Pipeline embolization device (ev3 Neurovascular, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and at least 1 follow-up angiogram. Technical feasibility, procedural complication, angiographic results, and clinical outcome were evaluated.</p> <p>RESULTS: Placement of the Pipeline embolization device was successful in all cases without evidence of procedural complication. Five out of 7 subjects showed a complete aneurysm occlusion at 6- to 12-mo follow-up angiogram. The 2 subjects with persistent aneurysm filling showed decreased aneurysm sac volume on follow-up angiograms (96% and 60%). There was no evidence of in-implant stenosis or intimal hyperplasia. No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications were seen during the follow-up period. Only 1 patient had a transient change in Modified Rankin scale score from baseline as a result of different unrelated procedure.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrate feasibility of the use of flow diverter stent for treatment of aneurysms of the pericallosal artery with rate of aneurysm occlusion comparable to literature and without evidence of increased procedural or short-term morbidity. A long-term and larger cohort study is needed to validate our findings.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathradiology_pubs/319
dc.contributor.departmentNew England Center for Stroke Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Intervention


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record