ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Imaging of Deep Inferior Epigastric Arteries for Surgical Planning (Breast Reconstruction Surgery)
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Expert Panel on Vascular ImagingOliva, Isabel B.
Day, Kevin
Dill, Karin E.
Hanley, Michael
Ahmed, Osmanuddin
Bennett, Shelby J.
Desjardins, Benoit
Gage, Kenneth L.
Ginsburg, Michael
Hamawy, Adam H.
Steigner, Michael L.
Strax, Richard
Verma, Nupur
Rybicki, Frank J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of RadiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2017-11-01Keywords
AUCAppropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
Breast cancer
Breast reconstruction surgery
Deep inferior epigastric artery
Deep inferior epigastric perforator
Cardiovascular System
Neoplasms
Radiology
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States. Breast reconstruction surgery is a commonly used therapy for patients with breast cancer. The technique for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap uses a preserved rectus muscle, which decreases donor site morbidity. Accurate identification and measurement of the perforator branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery is pivotal during pre-operative planning so that the surgeon can prioritize the best vessel to use and ultimately improve clinical outcome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.Source
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S456-S461. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/48254PubMed ID
29101984Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.047